T David Petite News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Maryellen Noreika in
SIPCO, LLC v. Aruba Networks, LLC et al., Civil Action No. 20-537-MN (D.Del. June 9, 2021), the Court denied Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings on Counts III and IV of Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure after concluding that Defendants failed to show that there are no material issues of fact and they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
By way of background, Plaintiff SIPCO is a research, development and technology company that was assigned various patents by its founder, T. David Petite, relating to moving data over wired and wireless networks.  On February 13, 2020, SIPCO advised defendant Aruba, a subsidiary of defendant Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, in writing that, it infringed certain SIPCO patents through Aruba’s sale of certain products.  ....

T David Petite , Maryellen Noreika , Crown Packaging Tech Inc , Reexam Beverage Can Co , Fox Rothschild , Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company , Aruba Networks , Memorandum Opinion , Honorable Maryellen Noreika , Civil Action , Federal Rules , Civil Procedure , Federal Circuit , Crown Packaging Tech , கிரீடம் ப்யாகேஜிஂக் தொழில்நுட்பம் இன்க் , நரி ரோத்ஸ்‌சைல்ட் , ஹெவ்லெட் ப்யாகர்ட் நிறுவன நிறுவனம் , அருபா நெட்வொர்க்குகள் , மெமோராண்டம் கருத்து , சிவில் நடவடிக்கை , கூட்டாட்சியின் விதிகள் , சிவில் ப்ரொஸீஜர் , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று ,