Often he mock him for his syntax and grammar, but he has a certain kind of logic that governs the way in which he throws out invective. it goes from the use of the nicknames to try to mock his opponents. sometimes it s in psychological astute ways. he s accused collusion. there s a discussion. that word means a lot of different things. he s tried to take the care of it by saying it over and over again. no collusion. no collusion. no collusion. in this case it s almost prophylactic. is there treason? is there traitorness? those accusations are thrown around and he s trying to head off that accusation and to try to take the power away from it ....