Front of us weeks back and another important step to the Customer Service thanks to the dphs for making this happen and also improved the one stop scenario there and thanks to ed sweney and the review staffers, the motion shake and dany lou for meeting on friday, august 16th with the four, person, japanese delegation doing research on building efficiency and we have a couple more and bear with me. Thanks to the chief building inspector, and the new ddi team appointed by acting director, on july 19th, to provide for the board that was effective on july 29, members including ron alan, inaudible and monitor and supervisor patty inaudible and we are working closely while it was expected to generate an increase in the condo recommendation and we received 220 applications from the initial 175 received as of july 29th. And dbis goal is to perform the 60 inspections per week and to complete the final report in two weeks, dpw, which also played a vital role in the conversions is expecting 60 to
Mandates that San Francisco puts on them that other cities and counties do not, they view this as a hostile Work Environment and may not be the worst legislation that you have seen. But it is one more thing that makes doing business in San Francisco more difficult and the perception of a hostile Business Community and in the relationship to city hall. And in terms of the costs, anything that takes time away from my business, costs me money. In terms of families leaving San Francisco, this legislation anot going to do anything that bad. They are leaving because they cant afford the house heres and because they lack faith in our Public Schools this does nothing for that. Most of my clients, this is dealing with not the big problems of San Francisco, this is sort of window dressing. And why dont people at city hall who are writing this, really tackle the tough issues that are really making people leave San Francisco. And if you go, to your compute and her google, the biggest problems in S
Because it gives the employee an opportunity to request, you know, flexibility schedules and so that their jobs can work with their families. We should not have to ask the employees to work exclusively at the expense of families tu, very much. Susan tucker and my company is one stop graphics and i have been in business for 25 years and also on the business of the chamber and a member of the Small Business advocates. This is, of course, very fieldgood, legislation. How can you be oppose thed to something that is familyfriendly . It is kind of like, the toy band, in the happy meals, it is as the supervisor said, it is kind of a nudge, it is trying to nudge maybe, employers and employees. But, i am wondering why do we need a Charter Amendment for a nudge . I note that many of the speakers that have spoken in favor of this legislation are talking about their parents. That is another generation. I believe that the workforce has evolved. I also understand that there may be one thing that thi
And a seamstress and they are both em grants and they are not like any of the people that are in this room. I grew up being told that i go to school and my parents worked hard to be here and they never wanted me to be sick, you know . To be helped so i can stay healthy, but also because they didnt think that they would be able to take care of me. Or to pick me up from school or to any of those things that you need to do when circumstances come up with your child. My sisters and i grew up really elthy, but every year, someone would come to school and be sick, i dont know why because sher parents told them not to be sick and they got sick and they were pushed to go to school. And infect the rest of us. And so, my parents, my mom was a seamstress and she could not take off the work to take care of us. But, eventually it came to a point where she had to take care of me and my sisters and my family over all in the house, so much more than work that she had to leave her job, she didnt have t
Employees. Is it just the San Francisco employees . Or is just in the total number of employees throughout the United States . It should be consistent with the other legislation. We have. A lot of the legislation says number of employees in the whole United States whether it is one employees or 50 somewhere else and they come under the minimum. We as a group will not oppose this legislation if it boils down to employees have a right to request time off or change in their schedule without retaliation. That is what we would like for this is something that good businesses do all of the time. You have heard that. We do that. And having that legislation, legislated is what we would like, thank you very much. Thank you. Next speaker, please . Hi, my name is rich gun and i am a cpa in San Francisco. My firm is inaudible and we have 200 employees and i have clients that are all over the city from bay view, out to the great highway and, practically every neighborhood. And i talked with them abo