i have to be concerned about privacy act concerns and classification, other than that, the commitment is to provide a public report, yes. can you guarantee this committee that special counsel durham has free reign to proceed where the investigation takes him without any political or otherwise undue influence or interference? there will be no political or otherwise undue interference. okay, susan hennesey was hired to work in national security division. this is troubling because of her political bias, made several comments that show she is incapable of working impartially on sensitive matters within the national security division, particularly on the durham investigation. for example, december 1, 2020, mrs. hennesey stated, durham has
organization to urge me to worry about election threats. nothing i knew about this organization to suggest it is any way partisan. it is a national school board association, i certainly never in my mind viewed that as a partisan organization. now they reputeiated their organization, why don t you say they didn t reputiated their letter, they reputiated language in the letter. core concern of the justice department, that is why. thank you. senator blackburn has asked for three minutes and i will conclude with my own three minutes. thank you, mr. chairman. attorney general garland, you just told me you don t think you met susan hennesey. did you hire susan hennesey? i have sign off authority for
dan: welcome back to unfiltered with dan bongino. the deep state, i don t care what you call it, the silly state, sloppy state, the deep state. doesn t matter to moment it s back. it s back because liberals fight to win and some rhinos fight for placement in the washingtonno posted tore y all column. we ll never win that way. check out the national review article. doj picks susan hen sigh with aa long sorted history of partisan conspiracy mongering, this was one of the chief collusion hoaxers who is brought back into the biden department of justice, again, they play to win. why does this story matter? it s not personal. i don t know susan. i never met her. she worked at the brookings institution while promoting the collusion hoax. here it is, right there. susan hennesey, senior fellow, focused on national security.
people. here s witty jumping to susan hennessey s defense. maybe he saw my podcast where i was exposing the scandal. i don t know why he s doing is. maybe he got wind that you and i would be on the air together. he said did she comment that kiss tosser steele was a christopher steele was a person whose work intelligence officials take seriously. it s a hilarious statement. steele wasn t taken seriously by his own sources. who told them, hey, he publishe? that stuff? this was bar joke. i didn t mean for a national investigation. this is a joke. you re absolutely right. i did read that. i i did wonder, like why did he put that out right now. i guesses trying to defend the blog and susan hennessey at the same time. maybe hoping that people won t pay attention to what s going on here because the muddies so mud is so thick and so murky most people can t see through it.
intelligence surveillance court. susan hennessey was more than willing to spread all of those lies. and even when the fbi in 2017, dan, actually questioned danshenko, he was i have no idea why christopher steele would n have used the information the dossier, it was hearsay. here was the main source for christopher steele s false does yeah against a sitting u.s. president that was duly elected by the american people. so the fact that all of these people, susan hennessey and others, as well, are getting jobs in the biden administration just tells me that they did what they were supposed to do, spread lies. and that is what frightens me more than anything, the weaponization of the doj. dan: nd here s the stunning par. really, the tamarity of these