A going to judge to explain see what we mean by that. We believe that intelligence fiscal policy kahlo calibrated double welldesigned can actually help boost growth and jobs. But to mean by that . I am not suggesting a new stimulus package because that is not the answer. But what i am suggesting is that because so much has already been done in terms of fiscal consolidation, countries that still need to put their finances in order have to do so at the right place, not too fast, not too brutally, and they have to adjust his circumstances and taken into account. And this is clearly what we do in the programs that we designed. We dont push countries into dasheen brutally. The pace is important, a sense of pace. Second, they have to be well targeted because if so they can contribute as well to boosting growth. For a sense, fighting to oxidation. Support more efficient public spending, reduce the burden of taxation and charges of labor cost, parole taxes, for instance, are clever fiscal meas
So we gather all of that material and base the decision on that. It seemed like she based it on a Legal Standard that certain things were required for refusal of a transfer. Attorneys, help me out. I think in the code it may specifically mention administrative probation cause thats an absolute in terms of if youre a company if the accepting company is on administrative probation then it absolutely cannot go to that company so in terms of that standard yeah, there is an absolute there. Now, admittedly its a bit of a low standard. We have to make sure we have all the information necessary to ensure proper compliance when your vehicle goes to another company, which includes insurance, Operational Program and vehicles. We have to know as well the vehicle thats going to be used, same vehicle, different vehicle, we get all that information. So sfmta stands by that standard for not transferring it okay, right . How do i word this . The sfmta is comfortable that the standard has been met that
Well as attracting mutual investments peter paul hardy added that he is ready for developing cooperation of the spheres as well. Rossi made the mistake they made it seem that he was so pleasant about it it was a pretty cool if this poll and it extends beyond the prospectus and the role of the conference and all on the projects we are going to the vocal get there. In the field of technology in the gulf energy in the field off the infamous an organizations being cute the dual band called in to mention the Financial Institutions us were less than european. Openness and secure each of them is it some where in kazakhstan was president and co thousand and ten in switzerland is going to be present xd so we had booked a profit of the experience of kazakhstan and was imprisoned by it was very patient and supportive seats. Forcing president tun have been suspended for several weeks a ghastly kids cause is being currently fixed and one underground pipelines of the field Surface Facilities for ext
Notification. One thing that at t did not point out is the workflow its identified in g all the Surface Facilities order whereas part of the process we reviewed the application we have a hearing its clearly stated location approved and if so it not if its approved we can moved to for the application for applees evaluation project but if its not approved their supposed to start over you identify a new location and process according. At t is suggesting that instead of having this logical box you approve the box based on the request or disparagraph that theyre saying we ignore this aspect of the workflow whether think an original location or alternative location thats two or three blocks away. The 3 had the foot radius and places the department in a situation where we couldnt get the necessary feedback from another group of folks who may be impacted. Going to the comment recommended to the timing were not following the 60 day requirement as requested. Their referencing the puc code we mus
Point. Is there a clarification request. Theres a Public Comment and we have a chance. I was going to recommend we have Public Comment but limited to this issue. Thats correct. Would you rather do that first . Lets do it that way. Is there anyone that would like to speak specifically to this issue whether these appeals are right at this time . The question is we will take Public Comment not on the substance of the appeals but whether these appeals are ready for the board to hear, whether they are in a its a procedural issue, technical. This is not on the merits. Im going to try if im not addressing yeah, let me try to restate it. Ill back off. Thank you. So the question that we asked the representatives and the parties to address is a very specific question relating to whether our board can even hear this matter based on a procedural issue. This is been argued i dont know if i need to go into this. Its been argued by the departments that it is not properly before us to be heard until a