around the rammed of rapid report forces. take a look. as the sunsets, our situation becomes more precarious. despite all the insu assurancese were given. 10:00 at night still hour and a half before our destination. every moment that we are delayed it gets more and more interest.. and delayed again. and again. and again. luckily, we manage to get in touch with a distant cousin of my father s who allows us to bed down in her new not yet furnished home. the team is exhausted. we need to get some sleep. the whole story this sunnyvale, 9 p.m. the source with kaitlan clines starts now. straight from the source, breaking news as a colorado judge resumed that drumpled can be on the ballot but he also engaged in the january 6th insurrection. now prosecutors want trump in court just three modify before the 2024 election. of course a reminder that is a trial had will be telg advised. also tonight, advertisers are fleeing fromee lon musk s x. as he is facing backlash from his anti
People lose coverage they want for themselves and their family. plus, russia s colorful ambassador to the united states is heading back to moscow. the kremlin says it has nothing to do with the russia meddling investigation. and several developments as the supreme court winds down its term. justices agree to decide the constitutionality of the trump travel ban, and clarify who can be blocked from entering the united states and who cannot. that clarification allows part of the trump travel ban to take effect. jessica schneider is outside the supreme court with more on this surprising feith day decision. jessica. reporter: for sure, john. an unexpected decision by the supreme court and a decision that could have both sides in this case, the trump administration as well as the plaintiffs, claiming small victories here. the trump administration will likely claim victory for the fact that the supreme court in a 6-3 decision allowed parts of this travel ban to take effect. saying that
Are religiously affiliated and want to be able to be exempted from this and not have to sign off on a waiver to say that this other insurer can provide contraception coverage. the bigger issue is going to be what the supreme court winds up doing with the lawsuits from corporations like the hobby lobby, which has about 15,000 people of various denominations working for them and they don t want to provide this kind of coverage. and that s wound up in front of the supreme court and that s a little bit more of a broader could have broader implications for this law. now, just quickly on that front, these are these court cases are going after certain provisions of the law. do any of the court cases, if you know, do they propose any existential issues for the law? well, the law is the law as far as the supreme court goes aside from some of these smaller items. the mandate was the big item that we were all waiting to see in the run-up to the election,