Live Breaking News & Updates on Supreme Court Granted Review
Stay updated with breaking news from Supreme court granted review. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
House democrats working overtime to deliver christmas impeachment vote against donald trump but what about the group of democratic lawmakers spot at a white house holiday event at the same time there judiciary colleagues were debating articles of impeachment. what we know about that. let s go to the house democrats efforts to oust donald trump. reporter: we are getting reaction about the supreme court ruling from both sides of the aisle, democrats running late today, disappointed congress will have to wait several months to get a final ruling. we look forward to getting our cases at the supreme court and hopefully court will agree with these well reasoned decisions, the president s personal attorney reporting we are pleased the supreme court granted review of the president s 3 pending cases, they raise significant constitutional issues, we look forward to presenting a written and oral arguments. ....
Last line of defense in keeping the president s financial returns out of the hands of democrats. they are hopeful that will stay a secret the president kept for so long. there s a statement we can show from one of the president s outside attorneys, we are pleased the supreme court granted review of the president s three pending cases. these cases raise significant constitutional issues. we look forward to presenteding our written and oral arguments. the president has another issue, impeachment, the president is ripping into house democrats after the judiciary approved those two articles of impeachment and the president painting himself as the victim and saying he still wants to hear from the whistleblower. he may be thinking twice about his hopes for a circus-like trial in the senate. just days after impeachment started, the president talked about what is coming. it is horrible using the tool ....
They are expecting to hear oral arguments in the cases in march. that means a decision is expected by june right in the middle of the presidential contest, wolf. interesting indeed. potentially very, very significant. kara scannell, thank you for that report. more on the breaking news on the supreme court decision to hear the president s appeal. our chief white house correspondent jim acosta is joining us now. what are the reaction? what you picking up over there. reporter: wolf, the president s outside legal team are welcoming this move by the supreme court. we have a statement from jay sekulow, the president s principal counsel outside of the white house saying we are pleased that the supreme court granted review of the president s three pending cases. these cases raise significant constitutional issues. and the statement goes on to say we look forward to presenting our written and oral arguments. obviously, wolf, the president s legal team wants to keep the financial records and ....
Removable only for cause, not at will. so we see agencies such as the federal communications commission, and the like. you rules that the creation of that independent agency was unconstitutional. that s particular independent agency was differently structured than the typical and traditional agency. i dissented in the d.c. circuit and a challenge to the constitutionality of that structure because there were two levels in essence. the supreme court granted review, the opinion by chief justice roberts. they agreed with the approach that i had set forth in the sense that in the dissent, the free enterprise, the case, and a chief justice roberts opinion in that case. and what about the cfpb case? ....
Slavery. here is the issue: is she going to abide by that? or is it whatever she decides? not based on history, or the text. that is where it is going. you have a case coming up right now, supreme court granted review and if she is confirmed she will hear it involving arizona and immigration issue and federal authority. it is a big case. it will have huge impact. i m afraid this is where you will see where elena kagan s. in the grand scheme of things will there be a shift as a result of her joining the court? are we not just substituting one 50-year-old progressive for one now retired 90-year-old progressive? don t undervalue what that means because if she sevens another 40 years that is significant. but more broadly, she does have the intelligent wall chops to be the liberal scalia, if you will, so this is a significant move much more than replacing justice souter with sotomayor. ....