Wasnt just showing up for court. Numerous january 6th cases have been heard. The judge overseeing trumps arraignment has also overseen the cases of people including dominic fox and Qanon Activist who live streamed the storming of the capitol, a jared wise, a former fbi agent charged with assaulting a Police Officer on january 6th. This is all very much a Trip Down Memory Lane for mr. Trump. Now, there were no Courtroom Cameras today, but thanks to courtroom sketch artist bill hennessy, we know what it looks like when a former president of the United States appeared in court to be formally and federally charged for trying to subvert american democracy. There were more than 110 people in the courtroom to hear this arraignment including several of the federal judges who have been presiding over other january 6th cases, judges who showed up today in plain clothes as spectators for trumps arraignment. The judge presiding over the arraignment was a New York State judge inasmuch he read the c
through the senate. we have fox team coverage with alexandria hoff and lucas tomlinson. reporter: the framework is significant in its own right coming to the point in agreement that has not been reached in decades. a statement from the group reads this, quote, our plan increases mental health resources, improves health safety and support for students and helps ensure dangerous criminals those who are adjudicated as mentally ill can t purchase weapons most importantly plans to save lives while protecting constitutional rights of law abiding citizens. it has billions more for mental health and school safety and expanded background checks for gun purchasers under the age of 21. the bipartisan group was led by senator chris murphy and john cornyn, ten republicans in total signed onto this agreement meaning as it s written now it has the ten needed to advance in the senatement on the senate majority leader chuck schumer added this, once the text of this agreement is finalized, i w
governor kemp and brad raffensperger. we re expecting within weeks this investigation to reach a conclusion. all signs, of course, point to donald trump s indictment. we re not expecting it imminently in the next few days but really within the next two weeks. the d.a. has said we ll have a decision before labor day. is there any overlap between the federal case and state case here? because there s certainly a lot of witnesses in common, and traditionally the federal criminal cases supercede, if you will, a state case. do you think there s going to be any deaferation to that when it comes to. a. willis. when the d.a. was asked about this a couple days ago she joked whether jack smith would even be able to get her name right. i m not sure, you know, how the
should do it fast and not traditional end of june where they release blockbuster decision. mike: firearms case out of new york state, robert, what are your expectations? the question is whether the state really has the ability to regulate these issues. whether or not heller is governing and supercede state law. let s remember that the second amendment says well regulated should be necessary for the security of the state. shall not be infringed part at the state but have the right to determine what individualized state laws exist with regard to the ability to keep firearm, the grip on them, the stock size, the ammo, magazine capacity, those sorts of things. it s interesting to see whether or not that s upheld or supercede or simply say the heller decision is governing on all states giving everybody the same constitutional right those that s you see in southern states like georgia, texas, et cetera. mike: mark, what are your