Acknowledgment] thank you, president. Item number 4 is general Public Comment. Nor part of the agenda iscommissioner staff to be aware of that is not appropriate for commissioners not properly set in a properly noticed agenda. Please send your communication via email. We did have one speaker card filled out if you would like to come up to the stand. Youll have two minutes for general Public Comment. Today i stand in support of boardas the secretary of tenants association, ive had the privilege of working closely with margo for the past ten months and i can attest to her role as president. Margo has demonstrated Exceptional Leadership qualities and a strong sense of responsibility in her position. When she was appointed i had confidence that she resolve existing challenges. Her proactive approach, within the board have been commendable. It is dis heartening to wit baseless accusations towards margo, particularly bit surnt secretary of ccsd. Criticizing somebody based on their appearance
Thank you. Good evening, commissioners from Pacific Islander berry want to make a few comments on the property ballot for the regulation of expenditure lobbyists as ive testified month lobbying is accomplished through the compensation of people to lobby city officials dribble the category was deleted from the law in 2010 because in part very few entities qualified since it appears that you have decided to move forward with adding back the expenditure lobbyists category to the ordinance i would like to thank commissioner renne and city stiff tar stimuli simplifying the definition of city lobbyist it provide for clarity over the previous versions and is consistent with the terminal in the lobbying laws i want to bring your attention one matter not previous discussion since the term expenditure lobbyists will apply inform any person pa makes payment of 2,500 to urge others to lobby the city officers this law my a apply to vendors of major projection in San Francisco that may file 5 report
Telephone it refers to the corporations the name of each officer of that corporation that could be a lot so lets say youre a tier one bang have offices all over the gloib want to put two atms under the district you have to file or do a get a conditional use permit having meetings and getting people involved and engaged im not sure it is necessary to have all 2 thousand offices to be submitted to the Ethics Commission unless youre the head of Human Resources to be listed theres probably a way to russet that so we know who you are going after this is going to the comments by commissioner hur that plain clothes say you dont want all 2 thesis officers at a bank to go be filed under the initial draft any less closer gloss hurdle it is important to get this done right the first time and ill ask you review that one portion a comment on the airbnb i know there are a lot of the commercials im an attorney but the commercials as played will not be included or covered by this legislation and. What
From Pacific Islander berry want to make a few comments on the property ballot for the regulation of expenditure lobbyists as ive testified month lobbying is accomplished through the compensation of people to lobby city officials dribble the category was deleted from the law in 2010 because in part very few entities qualified since it appears that you have decided to move forward with adding back the expenditure lobbyists category to the ordinance i would like to thank commissioner renne and city stiff tar stimuli simplifying the definition of city lobbyist it provide for clarity over the previous versions and is consistent with the terminal in the lobbying laws i want to bring your attention one matter not previous discussion since the term expenditure lobbyists will apply inform any person pa makes payment of 2,500 to urge others to lobby the city officers this law my a apply to vendors of major projection in San Francisco that may file 5 reports with the notification approve or disa
Through the compensation of people to lobby city officials dribble the category was deleted from the law in 2010 because in part very few entities qualified since it appears that you have decided to move forward with adding back the expenditure lobbyists category to the ordinance i would like to thank commissioner renne and city stiff tar stimuli simplifying the definition of city lobbyist it provide for clarity over the previous versions and is consistent with the terminal in the lobbying laws i want to bring your attention one matter not previous discussion since the term expenditure lobbyists will apply inform any person pa makes payment of 2,500 to urge others to lobby the city officers this law my a apply to vendors of major projection in San Francisco that may file 5 reports with the notification approve or disapprove under the developer disclosures law a major project as a real estate project in San Francisco where the Planning Commission or other lead agencies are certified an