It closed on june 19, 2012. Subsequently to the Public Comments document we noticed a minor area we would like to correct for the record. I have copies for the public as well on page 128 theres a footnote number 6 is erroneously struck through. In fact, it should have been shown that were adding it as imply text instead of eir. And theres another error with the footnote so, please restore them in those two locations. Having address the the error found it the implementation of the project wouldnt result in any significant Environmental Impact that couldnt be mitigated therefore the commission would not need to adopt a statement pursuant to the california quality act should the commission choose to approve the project. We would like to have the consents of the report show they are adequate. And we want this to show its okay. Thank you. Commissioners . I move to certify the error. Second. Commissioner anton i. I had h a question for staff its not part of the document i just want to note e
Final hearing and theyve been presented to you already on the general calendar good morning. Im lisa Planning Department staff. The item before you is the vial Impact Report for the project. A draft of the certification motion is before you. The definite was pushed on may second 2012. It closed on june 19, 2012. Subsequently to the Public Comments document we noticed a minor area we would like to correct for the record. I have copies for the public as well on page 128 theres a footnote number 6 is erroneously struck through. In fact, it should have been shown that were adding it as imply text instead of eir. And theres another error with the footnote so, please restore them in those two locations. Having address the the error found it the implementation of the project wouldnt result in any significant Environmental Impact that couldnt be mitigated therefore the commission would not need to adopt a statement pursuant to the california quality act should the commission choose to approve
And theres another error with the footnote so, please restore them in those two locations. Having address the the error found it the implementation of the project wouldnt result in any significant Environmental Impact that couldnt be mitigated therefore the commission would not need to adopt a statement pursuant to the california quality act should the commission choose to approve the project. We would like to have the consents of the report show they are adequate. And we want this to show its okay. Thank you. Commissioners . I move to certify the error. Second. Commissioner anton i. I had h a question for staff its not part of the document i just want to note even after certification we should realize that make sure the waterlines that come into the area that are going to service the new development are in adequate shape on the heels of the problem that the waterline think 15 avenue certainly that needs to be looked at. I suggest that as we move forward whether the prong is approved o
Groups that you to. On polk street friends i read the section on how it was so much worse the bars cleaned it up. The neighborhood clean up came on the backs of those people. This is the kind of person thats listed as a resident of polk neighbors. You know, youre hearing this about the coalition. This list of membership was pushed judge . Because we were eliminating me. They were changing the by laws to eliminate me. Why . Because i testify that about the bars at the Planning Commission. And after several times when this change was read over and over by the City Employees its a police code violation. I can be arrested for this. But almost all the resident are given because they were forced out by threats and intimidation in the press and yet those are the group that you say is our neighborhood is wrecked any additional Public Comment . Sue im asking the commission to request a hearing on a couple of hearing. One is a presentation of how where youre going to process with the dates where
The project wouldnt result in any significant Environmental Impact that couldnt be mitigated therefore the commission would not need to adopt a statement pursuant to the california quality act should the commission choose to approve the project. We would like to have the consents of the report show they are adequate. And we want this to show its okay. Thank you. Commissioners . I move to certify the error. Second. Commissioner anton i. I had h a question for staff its not part of the document i just want to note even after certification we should realize that make sure the waterlines that come into the area that are going to service the new development are in adequate shape on the heels of the problem that the waterline think 15 avenue certainly that needs to be looked at. I suggest that as we move forward whether the prong is approved or not approved its important to all parts of the city we look at the major adequacy. I know you talked about a drainage its eastbound predicted on wate