violence erupts in baltimore after the funeral of a man that died in police custody. his family calls for calm as a mayor imposes a curfew and calls in the national guard. welcome everyone. good morning. welcome to the smurf show. we digit plan this. we did meet last night. we did bump into each other. did you buy anything good? i did. a lot of fruit and things like that. i am known for being the worst cook but i m trying to cook. that s the reason you saw me. i have seen some of the pictures. i ll have you at my place and we ll eat blueberries. that s a great start to the show. all right. well, there are a lot of stocks in focus on the move. so let s give you a look at the big movers and the european banks on the move after earnings. commerce bank shares with their worst day in a year after announcing plans to raise 1.4 billion euros. this despite first quarter operating profit. more than doubling. let s get out to annettea live with that story. it s
it closed on june 19, 2012. subsequently to the public comments document we noticed a minor area we would like to correct for the record. i have copies for the public as well on page 128 there s a footnote number 6 is erroneously struck through. in fact, it should have been shown that we re adding it as imply text instead of eir. and there s another error with the footnote so, please restore them in those two locations. having address the - the error found it the implementation of the project wouldn t result in any significant environmental impact that couldn t be mitigated therefore the commission would not need to adopt a statement pursuant to the california quality act should the commission choose to approve the project. we would like to have the consents of the report show they are adequate. and we want this to show it s okay. thank you. commissioners? i move to certify the error. second. commissioner anton i. i had h a question for staff it s not part of the docu
and there s another error with the footnote so, please restore them in those two locations. having address the - the error found it the implementation of the project wouldn t result in any significant environmental impact that couldn t be mitigated therefore the commission would not need to adopt a statement pursuant to the california quality act should the commission choose to approve the project. we would like to have the consents of the report show they are adequate. and we want this to show it s okay. thank you. commissioners? i move to certify the error. second. commissioner anton i. i had h a question for staff it s not part of the document i just want to note even after certification we should realize that make sure the waterlines that come into the area that are going to service the new development are in adequate shape on the heels of the problem that the waterline think 15 avenue certainly that needs to be looked at. i suggest that as we move forward whether
the project wouldn t result in any significant environmental impact that couldn t be mitigated therefore the commission would not need to adopt a statement pursuant to the california quality act should the commission choose to approve the project. we would like to have the consents of the report show they are adequate. and we want this to show it s okay. thank you. commissioners? i move to certify the error. second. commissioner anton i. i had h a question for staff it s not part of the document i just want to note even after certification we should realize that make sure the waterlines that come into the area that are going to service the new development are in adequate shape on the heels of the problem that the waterline think 15 avenue certainly that needs to be looked at. i suggest that as we move forward whether the prong is approved or not approved it s important to all parts of the city we look at the major adequacy. i know you talked about a drainage it s east
final hearing and they ve been presented to you already on the general calendar good morning. i m lisa planning department staff. the item before you is the vial impact report for the project. a draft of the certification motion is before you. the definite was pushed on may second 2012. it closed on june 19, 2012. subsequently to the public comments document we noticed a minor area we would like to correct for the record. i have copies for the public as well on page 128 there s a footnote number 6 is erroneously struck through. in fact, it should have been shown that we re adding it as imply text instead of eir. and there s another error with the footnote so, please restore them in those two locations. having address the - the error found it the implementation of the project wouldn t result in any significant environmental impact that couldn t be mitigated therefore the commission would not need to adopt a statement pursuant to the california quality act should the commissi