Constitutionally. So i dont think its merely that. And in suleiman the government actually created the words that were, that were being advertised. So isnt that substantially different . Because the governments not creating these words. Justice sotomayor the court indicated that thats the monument course. Im talking about johanns. Thats right. But in suleiman though, a private organizes fraternal order of eagles put its name on the monument it created the message, then donated it to the park. In johanns, yes, the message was espoused beef, its whats for dinner, but even then the secretary of agriculture didnt write ad copy. Sorry, the government had control, it just was not at every step of the way saying this is how the message must be. But at the end of the day, it had final approval. But to return to Justice Alitos hypothetical and what the test should be, the test can include other elements. And even if suleiman and johanns could be read as just a twopart test for all sorts of reas