Confidence on where it lands. If you see fins on the nose of any of these things, they may have some sort of guided Precision System inside and thats even scarier. Question, two technical question. I love youre here to help us cover this. The distance, the range, the accuracy is one set of matters. Perhaps the most important sensitivity matters is what they can put on that missile. Whether or not they can bring it in successfully, right. You have the rv, the reentry vehicle. That May 14th Launch did Successfully Reenter the atmosphere. We dont know if they miniaturizeed a Nuclear War Head. We dont know if its small enough to put on the cone on the tip of a missile. Talk to some folks in the pentagon they think maybe, perhaps. Others in the general assessment within the Intelligence Community they havent achieved that yet. Heres the issue, the minute
want to make sure that the United States and south korea and our allies arent threatening the ability of this dynasty to continue leading
whether or not there is successful reentry. did it go as high as it did and successfully reenter. they will be asking how much of a time line did they have before this launch? it is liquid fuel. you can usually see them gassing it up. that will be the question, whether or not they saw it beforehand and how many were out there. initially they didn t know what was in the tubes. they may have just built the tubes. what do you mean? with satellites you see them gassing it up? when they have aerial intelligence they are never really clear on how they know