Stay updated with breaking news from Subset question. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Subset question one, is it still your contention that getting talks at all with the american president is baseline victory for the north? and when the president talks about these talks maybe not being over in one session, maybe several, maybe weeks, is that the kind of talks that should precede presidents sitting down at the table? it s become clear today, brian, if it wasn t clear before, that our president is an enormously ineffective negotiator. he has made massive concessions even on the road to singapore, putting aside what he s actually going to give up at the table across the table from kim jong-un. so first, brian, he s caved twice on the idea of the summit, first accepting the invitation outright initially without any consultations and without winning any concession. then once he canceled the summit, he caved a second time and re-accepted the invitation that was brought to him today to the oval office. second, he said the era of maximum pressure is over. and as hans noted ....
Intel. catherine lucey is back with us, white house reporter for the associated press. and also brian bennett returns to the broadcast, senior white house correspondent for time magazine. good evening and welcome to you all. jeremy, i m going to begin with you. is it still your first of all, what s going on here? subset question one, is it still your contention that getting talks at all with the american president is baseline victory for the north? and when the president talks about these talks maybe not being over in one session, maybe several, maybe weeks, is that the kind of talks that should precede presidents sitting down at the table? it s become clear today, brian, if it wasn t clear before, that our president is an enormously ineffective negotiator. he has made massive concessions even on the road to singapore, putting aside what he s actually going to give up at the table across the table from kim jong-un. so first, brian, he s caved twice on the idea of the summit, fi ....
Subset question one, is it still your contention that getting talks at all with the american president is baseline victory for the north? and when the president talks about these talks maybe not being over in one session, maybe several, maybe weeks, is that the kind of talks that should precede presidents sitting down at the table? it s become clear today, brian, if it wasn t clear before, that our president is an enormously ineffective negotiator. he has made massive concessions even on the road to singapore, putting aside what he s actually going to give up at the table across the table from kim jong-un. so first, brian, he s caved twice on the idea of the summit, first accepting the invitation outright initially without any consultations and without winning any concession. then once he canceled the summit, he caved a second time and re-accepted the invitation that was brought to him today to the oval office. second, he said the era of maximum pressure is over. and as hans noted ....
As hollow as that rhetoric is. but to donald trump he needs to say these thing tuesday make himself feel good. you talked about general kelly who does not express his feelings all that openly and talk about himself, this is president who spends a day doing that alone. peter baker, i don t mean this sarcastically, but what part of the trump agenda advanced today say from the white house to the hill? well, there is a deal tonight. we hear a republican and democrat coming together to puts a two-year fix on the health care subsidies, the order canceled just last week. this would stabilize the insurance markets if the president signs it. it sounds like the president embraced it, although he was a little vague about what he said about it. and that would be an important step forward. the question is whether that would lead congress towards a ....
Republicans in congress have offered. former republican congressman david jolly in florida, who went onto say with our guest, the republic may be safer with the democrats in majority. we re happy to welcome david jolly back with us tonight. gentlemen welcome both back to this broadcast. i ll give you a little while longer, to explain what must have been a discussion among your republican friends. i m not a republican who all of a sudden adopted nancy pelosi s politics. but the question is, and the news worthiness is there are more republicans who agree with this. and it s the principle of this. we know there s a matter of national security, right? the fact that mattis, kelly, mcmaster, tillerson have somehow ....