Stay updated with breaking news from Subpoena somebody. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
People say. it s not like there is a buffer zone in front of an election during which you can t conduct any law enforcement activity. what these policies say that have been repeatedly art clalted by different attorneys general, they always modify them some or somewhat, say that you can t carry out law enforcement activity in order to influence an election. you can t conduct a search, you can t, you know, subpoena somebody in order to affect the election. it doesn t say you can t do something that would have the peripheral or collateral effect of affecting the election. it doesn t mean law enforcement activity has to stop. i think that s what many people think it says and, in fact, it s different. so as long as the government isn t doing this in order to affect the election, there s nothing that would violate the policy. how high is the bar for the public integrity section when it comes to essentially executing a ....
Not meet. it was helpful to get his her spec testify. the book was about everything that happened during the campaign. i was interviewed high level campaign source, people at the rnc and state and local level. nothing goes in unless it s substantiated. that s what was important. howie: in general, in terms of writing and reporting and thinking about trump related issues it s nice to be able to talk to a president or former president but is there also a danger there? i think any time you have high level access, and i ve had that because i interviewed supreme court justices, senate majority leaders, speakers of the house, you have to balance that with actually not just reporting what actually happened. howie: right. and that exactly is the key, i think. everybody wants access and really helps to know what subpoena somebody s real somebody s really thinking. you ve got to make journalistic judgments. mollie hemingway, author of rigged, thanks for doing double duty today. still to co ....
Administration are looking for a scapegoat. so what do you do now? they in effect say we re doing everything we can. so can you make them do anything more? well, look, i m the surgeon general. i don t have the i don t make laws, and i don t make regulations. what i can do is tell the country what s happening in terms of forces that threaten their health and lay out path hadways that we can take to pathways we can take to address these factors. i acknowledge they re taking some steps and i appreciate that. but i m also very clearly saying it is not enough. intention is good. but at the end of the day it doesn t save the life of subpoena somebody who is misled by misinformation on these sites who didn t get vaccinated, got sick and lost their life as a result. so that s where we ve got to i m asking these companies to step up and take responsibility for what s happening on their sites. i m asking them to look out for the people all across this ....
Administration are looking for a scapegoat. so what do you do now? they in effect say we re doing everything we can. so can you make them do anything more? well, look, i m the surgeon general. i don t have the i don t make laws, and i don t make regulations. what i can do is tell the country what s happening in terms of forces that threaten their health and lay out path hadways that we can take to pathways we can take to address these factors. i acknowledge they re taking some steps and i appreciate that. but i m also very clearly saying it is not enough. intention is good. but at the end of the day it doesn t save the life of subpoena somebody who is misled by misinformation on these sites who didn t get vaccinated, got sick and lost their life as a result. so that s where we ve got to i m asking these companies to step up and take responsibility for what s happening on their sites. i m asking them to look out for the people all across this ....
The president the most? probably hope hicks because hope hicks is someone that isn t as experienced as say donaldson or mcgahn in answering questions and she will be asked about questions that could have no privilege. what kind of things could she shine a light on that would be legally damaging to the president? this is a brilliant tactic. whenever you re subpoenaing people, the main person, like don mcgahn may have a privilege claim or something else but instead subpoena the secretary, subpoena the assistant, subpoena somebody that was preacceptability at everything but doesn t have so much criminal liability because they were more witnesses than participants. those are folks that you can bring different pressure points to bear against and thget them testify and get their cooperation because they don t have the same degree of loyalty ....