We well break it all down through the legal spokesperson for the former president s attorney alina habba. Hunter binds a private citizens and this is a personal matter for him. Shannon Hunter Bidens plea deal has a r roadblock is unraveling us in agreement with the government gives more fuel to republicans pursuing their own investigations. You cannot hide from bank records you could not hide from suspicious Activity Reports regret this is impeachment inquiry. Shannon a move towards impeachment present but it will get reactions from nancy mace its a fox news send exclusive. And republican candidates descend on iowa. Months ahead of the first in the Nation Caucus State as the Desantis Campaign undergoes a reset. Have all about substance at the end of the debris. Candidates meet some of the key qualifications for the debate stage we will sit down with one of those candidates north dakota governor doug burgum is taking heat for getting creative. Only on fox news sunday. Then. What are you
over. if president trump did not want something turned over i assure you that is something that could have been done. but he never would act like that. it s the most ethical american i know. shannon: a talk about the indictment pretty bring this up there indictments that he, with a couple other employees at mar-a-lago had conversations for their s allegations about trying to get rid of surveillance video. once it was under subpoena part let me read from the indictment this is a new superseding indictment the property manager there at mar-a-lago told trump employee that the boss wanted the server deleted for the sum of the surveillance video was. trump responded he would not have to do that he did not believe he had the rights to do that. trump employee foretold that had would have to reject another employee who was a supervisor of security for trump s business organization. then insisted to trump employee for that quote the boss wanted the server deleted and asked what are we going to
over. if president trump did not want something turned over i assure you that is something that could have been done. but he never would act like that. it s the most ethical american i know. shannon: a talk about the indictment pretty bring this up there indictments that he, with a couple other employees at mar-a-lago had conversations for their s allegations about trying to get rid of surveillance video. once it was under subpoena part let me read from the indictment this is a new superseding indictment the property manager there at mar-a-lago told trump employee that the boss wanted the server deleted for the sum of the surveillance video was. trump responded he would not have to do that he did not believe he had the rights to do that. trump employee foretold that had would have to reject another employee who was a supervisor of security for trump s business organization. then insisted to trump employee for that quote the boss wanted the server deleted and asked what are we going to
to be aggressive in the house. their just trying to get the help from their friend at the top of the justice department. but it is noteworthy that there s not all that there are a lot of democrats who are not pleased with the way merrick garland is continuing a lot of investigations, even separate from this. to the subpoena part, you have it started under jeff sessions when he was the first trump attorney general, continued, reinvigorated under barr. rod rosenstein was the deputy attorney general who carried over for a period of time. all three of them say they know nothing about this. how can that be? that s the power of a subpoena. put them under oath so they have to say that under oath which carries more weight. to me it s more scary. if you have two attorneys general and a deputy attorney general running the department who did not know this was happening. that s scary. something so significant, going after the news media, going after two prominent members of congress, the h
materials. the hearing is adjourned. shepard: shepard smith in new york. remember, the matter of subpoena was a matter of contention and was breaking news through much of the day yesterday. initially acting attorney general whitaker had said if the possibility of subpoena exists, i don t want to testify. and then it was reported that he softened his language, the chairman did, by saying if we get all the answers, what we want from you is the answers. we expect you to give answers. leaving the subpoena part out. well, we just have been notified now as has the acting attorney general by chairman nadler there that a subpoena is possible if necessary on a number of questions which the acting attorney general obviously did not answer and would not answer. of course, the question of executive privilege remains. on other matters, chairman nadler seems to believe the committee is entitled to answers