than $725 billion for lawsuits and without its biggest, brightest star, tucker carlson the new york times reports that his departure is made more stun big the fact that the network did nothing after carlson pushed the envelope over and over, pedaling inflammatory information. quote, the network stuck by him after carlson claimed that immigration had made america, quote, poor and dirty. he seemed to shrug off a racist conspiracy theory known as the great replacement, along with the fact that when russia invaded ukraine, he seemed to promote russia s point of view the fallout from carlson s ouster is unclear. quote, mr. carlson s rise prefigured trump s takeover of the republican party his own conversion from bow tied libertarian to popularist remade the party. he prospered with trump s presidency he made frank nativism the primary touch stones of republican politics. if fox and its host prospered because of trump, their efforts to deny the presidential results threw the netw
very salient and will continue to be as her lawsuit stays in it s moving through the system these are not deadi issues. even after 40 minutes it s not clear to her or me what is behind the decision to fire tucker carlson it s apparently not part of the settlement with dominion she has no information to suggest it s part of her lawsuit directly this sort of mystery endures, which if you just i m a student of, for better or worse, of the content in that 8:00 p.m. hour the content didn t repulse them. what did it really is just utterly amazing that none of this seemed to be enough to fire carlson or at least correct course with him and then suddenly something happens. i mean, we can only imagine how bad that would have to be.
we hear about crashes on the edges of this ci . ., ,~ we hear about crashes on the edges of this ci . ., i. we hear about crashes on the edges of this city- of this city. let me ask you to step back from the of this city. let me ask you to step back from the immediacy - of this city. let me ask you to step back from the immediacy of - of this city. let me ask you to step back from the immediacy of being | of this city. let me ask you to step i back from the immediacy of being in the capital and look across the international relations which of course you are a keen student of, how do you assess the nature of the west s support for ukraine almost a week into this? week into this? unprecedented. someone was week into this? unprecedented. someone was contrasting - week into this? unprecedented. someone was contrasting the i week into this? unprecedented. . someone was contrasting the votes week into this? unprecedented. - someone was contrasting the votes at the united nations in 20
there is a provision in the amendment which allows congress to create a new body, maybe independent experts, whoever, who could make an assessment under the 25th amendment. that s something that needs to be seriously done because we can t have this happen again. it s just terrifying. you mentioned milley was a student of history, george. specifically he was a student of is a student still of world war ii history. i mean, there s one the new york times anecdote where it says, don t get him going about a certain battle in north africa that involved the nazis. he s really into the minutiae of it. he described these anti-government extremists who are fans of trump as the brown shirts, the militia that aided the nazis, right. and i wonder because looking to the past, how it looked to the future. we are very much in the middle of this as republicans are whitewashing this, what happened with the insurrection. do you think this is going to be
government, can break through to the circle of family and friends, around president trump, who is accustomed to running a family business, not an extended government. and this incident, reveals the kinds of things i fear were still seeing elements of and how we are being governed to day. one of the things the president said today was he praised his sons what he called transparency. lot of people have taken issue with the idea that donald trump is being transparent. you re a student of, of human behavior, sure you have read a lot of interviews with people, over the years. in your work. when you hear somebody giving one explay natination one day. coming out with a statement the next day. which adds to it. then seems to sort of contradict what it was said the day before. and then the next day under pressure, that, that the e-mails are about to be released. releases e-mail. did you find a credible narrative from the person. certain point. the person lose credibility in