And if you re not, i m going to be very disappointed in you. I ll tell you right now. A new filing from special counsel jack smith reveals bomb shell never before seen evidence about donald trump and the election interference case. Also tonight, the damming nonanswer when jd vance refused to say that trump lost that 2020 election he tried to steal. Plus, while vance was acting normal at the debate, trump was spiraling out of control, with increasingly confused, nonsensical, meandering remarks. But we begin tonight with the 2020 election. And special counsel jack smith s newest legal filing that lays out in clear terms how candidate trump in his personal capacity lost that 2020 presidential election and resorted to crimes to try to stay in office any way. This brand new filing came after leonard leo s six blessed donald trump with broad immunity as a former president for official acts taken while in office. With this document, the special counsel is trying to convince u. S. District jud
Tim walz s record is a joke. Mind your own damn business. Donald trump s second running mate. I smile at a lot of things including bogus questions from the media. And the governor of minnesota these guys are creepy and weird as hell. With the election five weeks away, the campaigns meet facetoface for what might be the final time. We have people power on the side of donald j. Trump and that s going to carry the people. This is not about power. This is about public service. Tonight, team coverage with rachel maddow, nicolle wallace, joy reid, chris hayes, lawrence o donnell, ari melber, stephanie ruhle, jen psaki. Symone sanders townsend, and steve kornacki at the big board, alex wagner at the debate in new york city, and senators mark kelly of arizona and amy klobuchar of minnesota. Msnbc s special coverage of the vice presidential debate begins now. Hello there. Welcome. It is great to have you here. We know you have every choice in the world for where to watch the big debate, so we
Contrast, rather than as proxy voters, it is free to do so. In short, states determine how to select a electors and ensure they meet the relevant requirements and perform their duties as assigned. This means that states can oversee bribery as an incident, as a power to appoint. Tos must include the power remove and elector without a criminal trial. Under my friends position, as a practicality, ride electors would cast ballots and even legal votes. The state prevented him from casting a legal ballot. As this court explains in ray, the purpose and history of the 12th amendment reflected the reality that electors acted as pledge agents and the history of such pledges should be given great weight. Point,ustice ginsburgs and it is worth noting that people rely on such pledges taken voluntarily. Be of requirements would little value if not enforced. In almost 70 years since ray, states have continued to an act loss. Congress has consistently deferred to the Plenary Authority and no court oth
One who engages in a rebellion or one who would perpetrate a bait and switch on the people of the state by voting contrary to the binding pledge. Rather than as proxy voters, they are free to do so. The states determine how to select electors and ensure they meet the relevant requirements and perform their duties as assigned. This means they can oversee bribery as the power to appoint. This must include the power to remove and elector without requiring a full criminal trial. Under my friends position as a practicality, they would cast a valid and illegal votes. In this case the state presented him from casting the ballot just like it is an illegal ballot if you dont find it here in colorado. As the court explained the purpose reflected the reality that the act did as pledge agents for their Political Parties and the history of such should be given great weight. As the justices point about the importance of enforcing the pledge requirement, its worth noting people rely on such as this t
This oral argument is one hour. The Colorado Department of state i noted at the outset Justice Sotomayor is recused on the case. The constitution authorizes the states to use their authority to remove the elector one who engages in a rebellion or one who would perpetrate a bait and switch on the people of the state by voting contrary to the binding pledge. Rather than as proxy voters, they are free to do so. The states determine how to select electors and ensure they meet the relevant requirements and perform their duties as assigned. This means they can oversee bribery as the power to appoint. This must include the power to remove and elector without requiring a full criminal trial. Under my friends position as a practicality, they would cast a valid and illegal votes. In this case the state presented him from casting the ballot just like it is an illegal ballot if you dont find it here in colorado. As the court explained the purpose reflected the reality that the act did as pledge ag