debates and turn to foreign policy. there has to be some space between ron paul and dick cheney and no one is occupying it. either an incredibly isolationist agenda of ron paul not majority position of american politics or the most bellicose dick cheney neoconservative line that seems to have learned nothing from the lessons of iraq. the space between those are occupied by the president of the united states. they have a strategy problem they need to distinguish themselves from the sitting president. part of the way they ve done this is gotten the old band back together. those are the people running foreign policy. if i want to know what foreign policy will look like, don t listen to mitt romney. foreign policy unlike domestic policy where there are constituents you have to paille tension to. foreign policy is what consensus elite policy advisors are.
either an incredibly isolationist agenda of ron paul not majority position of american politics or the most bellicose dick cheney neoconservative line that seems to have learned nothing from the lessons of iraq. the space between those are occupied by the president of the united states. they have a strategy problem they need to distinguish themselves from the sitting president. part of the way they ve done this is gotten the old band back together. those are the people running foreign policy. if i want to know what foreign policy will look like, don t listen to mitt romney. foreign policy unlike domestic policy where there are constituents you have to paille tension to. foreign policy is what consensus elite policy advisors are. there is no difference in lessons learned and world view and outlook in the republican party since iraq. the people who emerged from the george bush administration
having the iraq war spokesman speaking on your behalf doesn t seem like a bad thing to republicans? i have pondered this for a long time. i genuinely don t understand this. you watch the republican primary debates and turn to foreign policy. there has to be some space between ron paul and dick cheney and no one is occupying it. either an incredibly isolationist agenda of ron paul not majority position of american politics or the most bellicose dick cheney neoconservative line that seems to have learned nothing from the lessons of iraq. the space between those are occupied by the president of the united states. they have a strategy problem they need to distinguish themselves from the sitting president. part of the way they ve done this is gotten the old band back together. those are the people running foreign policy. if i want to know what foreign policy will look like, don t listen to mitt romney.
who for a long time now has been criticizing europe almost daily. dear president trump america does not have and will not have a better ally than europe. america your allies. afterall, you don t have that many. please remember this all when we meet at the nato summit, but above all when you meet president putin in helsinki. who is your strategy friend and who is your strategy problem? quote dear donald trump u.s. does not have and won t have a better ally than had it eu. we spend on defense much more than russia and as much as china. i hope you have no doubt. as hooeso often does donald