how could the school defend that? the school did not defend it they did fire the writer. they did not attack enough action and the reason is because the university star has a history of putting out articles like this including one that called for a month ago the sterilization of an entire class of people and said free speech is for white people sterilization of whom? wealthy. it was good for the environment if the wealthy were sterilized and we are not allowed reproduce as they put it. what would happen. let s stop playing games. not you but, oh , first amendment write if he wrote. i believe in genocide for any other racial or ethnic group would he be on campus. would not somebody call the cop. if he called if the killing of people the university says, oh ,
group. how could the school defend something like that? the school didn t defend it. they did fire the writer. but they didn t take enough action. the reason they didn t take enough action is because the university star has a history of putting out articles like this, including one that called for just about a month or two ago, the sterilization of an entire class of people. they also wrote an article called free speech is for white people. tucker: the sterilization of whom? the wealthy. they said it was good for the environment if the wealthy were sterilized and were not allowed to reproduce, as they put it. tucker: what would happen let s stop playing games not you, but, oh, he s got a first amendment right. if he had written a column saying i sincerely believe in o genocide for any other racial or ethnic group, but he still be on campus? wouldn t someone call the cops? if he called for the killing of people, do you think the
and stop playing games. now, blue states went blue, that doesn t surprise me. but still, we would have like to have had won some of those seats. so virginia is officially a blue state in brian lanza s book now? they have two u.s. senators and control all the statewides. that is a blue state by every measurement. we heard that from cory gardner, as well. dems won expectedly dem seats, chris. the line from the new york times overnight was, trumpism without trump doesn t work. was gillespie s mistake that he didn t run close enough to trump, didn t bear hug him enough or didn t create enough distance? i think it s you have to do both of those things, kate, in order to win. remember, ed gillespie almost lost the primary back in june to a guy named cory stewart who was involved with the trump campaign in virginia, although was let go from that job. no one thought that race was going to be close, including ed gillespie. he narrowly sneaks by. why? because the trump base doesn t
gasp to try to push for some compromise that will at least mitigate what the president is able to do on his immigration plan and use their power of the purse which this is in order to force that to happen. democrats are playing hardball by saying no we are not, you look at the screen right now, 172 democrats voted against funding the department of homeland security. they didn t do it because they don t want to fund the department. they did it because they don t want to just do it temporarily for three weeks. they are saying if you want to fund it let s fund it for real. we are not going to play you have heard democrats all day on the house floor saying stop playing games, this is amateur hour all kinds of ways that they are pushing their fellow democrats not to go along with this. i said both sides are playing hardball. the question is which side is going to give in and it looks like the numbers haven t moved now in at least ten minutes. so what we initially thought going into this
stops and we stand up and we all say we are all alcoholics and it has got to stop now. i also think you got to say that you take responsibility for the decisions that you make and if you have borrowed you got to pay. neil: understood but when you keep doing this what you are saying is we can t make tough decisions so we will keep raising the ceiling is so we don t have to. well, we could change the way that we operate and change the way that we finance government. you know, why don t we neil: what do you think lincoln would say if he were to come back and look at the games that republicans and democrats say when it comes to the debt ceiling and spending money that we don t have. what do you think he would say? he would probably say let s stop playing games and change the way that we function. neil: i think you re right. and on that a we agree. congressman thank you. a pleasure having you. thank you, indeed, it is a pleasure. neil: by the way, great pipes. a great voic