are forced to repeat whatever childish slogan theye1 come up with this week. in a mocking voice carlson said, vladimir putin is a war criminal. and if you ve lost tuckere1 carlson you re in trouble. well, this is not a good loou for ron desantis. look, i think it s good that he s willing tolp say that vladimir putin is a war criminal because he is a /s criminal. it s good he s distancing himself a little bit from the trump surrender caucus. but there s no question about it, this was hisq first big public policy announcement foreign policy announcement. and you know, whether or not it s a flip-flop, it s clearly ( walkback. it s a skim-back. and when you re explaining like this you are losing. so it does feed some ofxd the doubts that perhapslp ron desans iç@lnot as ready for prime time as we thought. and i think what makes it worse is not just that he s got tucker carlson on his case butw3 also
now. thank you for this delightfuln■handoff. it s my pleasure tolp do so an old friend. an old friend. great show tonight,fá my e1frie. thanks for joining us.q we start the wall street journal broke the story about the;xp &h% alleged hush moneyt( payments tr stormy daniels to buy her silence over anxd alleged sexua encounter withok donald trump. the manhattan district attorney atñijf theñi time opened an investigation after the news broke. michael cohen went before congress in 2019 and he threwok the gates wide open. notq only revealed new details about trump s direct involvement that hush money scheme he alsoe droppedfb■] this bombshell. mr. trump is a cheat.
good to be with you. i m katy tur. we are watching thee1e1 manhatt eca what happense1 if bragg decideso charge? what happens if donald trump is arrested? ç táu)(? there are arguments raging on all sides of the issue today. from this only makes trump stronger tolp no one benefits fm getting indicted, not even trump. if the daniels incident is worth tempting faith. andrew weissman is with us ande argues that yes, it is. what the d.a. could be charging is serious and worthy. republicans say it s not. they say it s bragg who should be indicted.
back in march, no favoring or xddisfavoring of political parties. the plan enacted by thejf state % basis unduly fabering or disfavoring any political party. that piececjtfá ñ part of h.r. 1, the for the people act.c it sçóok a ban on partisanxd gerrymandering so nofá state wod be able to draw itsjf districts for elections in a way that sts designed to benefit one particular party. boy, that wouldfá ber ther originallyokccw3 constructed wa( tolp put ax&t=a with that language in it, everyone in the housexdw3 voted against it.xd.