The State Department. Putting iran on notice, is this trumps new red line . Hi, erin. Definitely being presented as a hard line on iran. Maybe somewhat blurry one at this point. But the white house is saying that it is dedicated to Holding Iran Accountable after this latest Missile Launch. And it is considering a whole range of options in a response and, yes, that does include a military one. A tough line on iran at the white house today. As to have day, we are officially putting iran on notice. Reporter National Security adviser Michael Flynn offering a cryptic warning after iran tested another Ballistic Missile sunday. The Obama Administration failed to respond adequately to tehrans malign actions including weapons transfers, support for terrorism, and other violations of international norms. Reporter the new administration making its clear it believes the Missile Launch violated a u. N. Resolution. Flynns comments today follow
its missile program. But prior tests have gone down with
i was there because that was my friend clem s funeral, who was claims that he had this sort of distant relationship with jeffrey epstein. murdered by dylann roof. we can see with our own eyes and so on a personal level, and i hear with our ears that that is have always said this about the simply not true. i think that, you know, by the president and his behavior, this leads to violence because that s where all of this eventually time the investigators sort goes. he s turned the presidency not through all the documents and into an office to defend the american people, not into an office to sort of spread the technology that are in the american ideals, but into an possession of jeffrey epstein, we are going to come to learn a office to abuse and oppress and lot more about the real elicit violence both state and relationship between donald trump and jeffrey epstein. vigilante violence against people who live here. paul butler, i wonder just we will see more funerals like from a law enfo
you understand? where do we go from here, how do we fix this? honestly, susan, i don t know how. i don t, either. think we re all trying to figure it out. helping us figure it out is christian, who joins us from washington, d.c. christian, i was talking with garrett a moment ago about this small two dozen large group of protesters who showed up today. and we re talking about the lack of cohesiveness there. help us understand the motivating factors, what are they? well, you know, what i saw today were several thousand counterprotesters and only a few dozen white nationalists. toipt i want to be clear so many of the organizers from last year distanced themselveses from the rally. their strategy is to go mainstream. what they saw happen last year hurt their numbers a little bit. kessler had gone off, he d done this rally under and it underperformed. the rest of the leaders are going more underground. what s more dangerous is somebody like jason kessler with
we need to move forward. bill: very well stated. we have to stoipt. bill: i get it. do you think they have the will? do you think they have the desire? if you are blaming democrats for some time. i m blaming both. bill: democrats may hold it as a political issue for the mid-terms. do you see this being solved? will you be back here in five years talking about the same thing? lord, i hope not. it is costing texas and everyone in the country billions of dollars and the crime that comes with it. i ve been watching the last two days in new york the stories about charles krauthammer. it is time for statesmen and gentlemen in congress and people bigger than themselves. when you get elected your biggest responsibility is to hour state but you have to be bigger than yourselves and you have a responsibility to the country. this is terrible for our country. i love to see paul ryan call
pruitt is a different creature. there s still talk about moving him into jeff session s role at some point. so clearly is not soured on pruitt the way others in the party have. but explain to met difference here. there s the difference which you talk about is policy, right? because i think back to tom price at hhs and the president specifically cited the optics of what price was doing with the pricey talf, et cetera, et cetera. the oipt ticks for pruitt aren t great either the difference teams sooems to be the policy. pruitt is killing it, slated over the epa but on the ethics piece, senator rounds had an interesting discussion with chuck todd over the weekend and i want to play you a bit because i want to see what you think. do you think he should still be epa administrator? i do. why? because he s following through with the policies that the president said he wanted to implement. what ethics matter, though? because tom price did less and was fired? look, the reason why