Page 4 - Sthijs News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Sthijs. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Sthijs Today - Breaking & Trending Today
We have to go back to that because there is so little to work with here. anything is still really possible. bob, how does this compare to other aviation mysteries you have covered? this one is taking a lot longer. got you out of retirement. yes. even the most difficult of investigations, we re going in the third week, you said. this far out with so little to work with. so yeah, we re into a real mystery here. and the value of these sthijs trying to figure out what happened. you give the families some closure and so forth. the real reason for investigate something to figure out what do you need to do, generally. what lessons with you learcan y? if we don t learn more, we don t know what sort of things to go after. anthony, are there things we can take from this? there have been red flags raised about the ability of the passengers to travel on stolen documents and prapts etch over ....
Of rahm emanuel, and david axelrod and top aides there that he was a hero to the mafia. this must have ticked some people off when it was published? it is quite possible. there are lots of thijs in there, and this is as we say close to the bone, and this is a total universe portrait in the nature of the relationships and the attitudes, jones, was, you know, somebody who was not part of the campaign team. very senior general, and, you know, he didn t fit. i think that everyone has noted that as he resigned. well, you can see the full interview with bob woodward sunday morning at 10:00 a.m. eastern on reliable source with howard kurtz interview. joining us now is our senior contributor is fran townsend who ....
Or what? well, there are a couple of thijs here. the first is that the judge did not need to recuse himself. not only was he appointed by reagan but he also apopointed by bush the elder. sorry. was a few years off. what i wanted to say is he also represented the olympics against the gay olympics so he is a conservative judge. just because he s gay doesn t mean he needs to recuse himself. not conservative. libertarian judge, i would say he s libertarian. look ok, well, his previous rulings. if you live in california and you voted against prop 8 for whatever reason, ok? and then you said, well, why did they even show up? what is this? one guy makes this decision? how do you explain that? i ll tell you why, because our constitution needs to be protected. remember loving vs. virginia in 1967 made it illegal for blacks and whites to marry. just because it was a law does ....
Or what? well, there are a couple of thijs here. the first is that the judge did not need to recuse himself. not only was he appointed by reagan but he also apopointed by bush the elder. sorry. was a few years off. what i wanted to say is he also represented the olympics against the gay olympics so he is a conservative judge. just because he s gay doesn t mean he needs to recuse himself. not conservative. libertarian judge, i would say he s libertarian. look ok, well, his previous rulings. if you live in california and you voted against prop 8 for whatever reason, ok? and then you said, well, why did they even show up? what is this? one guy makes this decision? how do you explain that? i ll tell you why, because our constitution needs to be protected. remember loving vs. virginia in 1967 made it illegal for blacks and whites to marry. just because it was a law does ....
Or what? well, there are a couple of thijs here. the first is that the judge did not need to recuse himself. not only was he appointed by reagan but he also apopointed by bush the elder. sorry. was a few years off. what i wanted to say is he also represented the olympics against the gay olympics so he is a conservative judge. just because he s gay doesn t mean he needs to recuse himself. not conservative. libertarian judge, i would say he s libertarian. look ok, well, his previous rulings. if you live in california and you voted against prop 8 for whatever reason, ok? and then you said, well, why did they even show up? what is this? one guy makes this decision? how do you explain that? i ll tell you why, because our constitution needs to be protected. remember loving vs. virginia in 1967 made it illegal for blacks and whites to marry. just because it was a law does ....