Because there are four of us here . That is correct. The reason is based upon due process to be heard by a Appellate Tribunal without all members presents constitutes a deprivation of due process. Well, i have my own opinion of that argument, and we do have our own process here. Im wondering what prejudice it would be to postpone for one week . Whats the prejudice here . To the determination holders i suppose its the prejudice its being held up. The letter of determination is suspended until oh it is. I thought the last decision released. Okay. I dont think the basis that youve stated is sufficient to move it another week. It will be noted for the record that there are only four of the five members of the board of appeals members present and again before the gong goes down to my friend from hastings has everybody who is present of the four who are present read our brief in support of the request for rehearing . [inaudible] may i have an answer to that question . I dont think it is for
Welcome back to the february 13ths 2013, board after peels, we are calling 10 a, appeal no, 12155 and 12156 and both are Steven Greenwald and Rochelle Alpert and both are at 67 predidio avenue, protesting the issue ans on november 26th 2012 to Jennifer Chow and steve minisii, permit to alter the building, revision to bpa no 201201182484 and remove existing walls at second floor and new roofing and repair with the stucco and a Building Permit to revise the earlier Building Permit and remove the existing walls at second floor and new roofing. Mr. Sanchez. Sorry. Planning department. Thank you for the boards patience on this matter and the complexity of it. We did have some discussion with the appellant and the proposal to make to the board for your consideration that will address the concerns of all of the parties. If i may, so the two items that are on appeal, they are one relates to the roof deck and the other one relates to the removal of the nonpermitted addition in the rear yard whi
Commission. Joseph duffy is here. Perfect timing. City and building inspector representing building inspection and john is here manager of the Public Works Bureau of street use and mapping. Mr. Pacheco at this time if you would go over the meeting guidelines and conduct the swear in process. The clerk requires that you turn off all cell phones. Appellants have seven 7 minutes for their cases and 3 minutes for rebut amounts people affiliated must include their comments in the three 3 minutes period. Members who are not affiliated have up to three 3 minutes to address the board and no rebuttals. To assist the board in the accurate representation of minutes, members of the board are asked but not required to submit a speaker card. Speaker cards are available. If you have questions about requesting a rehearing, board rules or hearing schedules, please speak to the staff after the meeting or call the board office tomorrow located on mission street. This meeting is broadcast live on cable ch
The meeting of the San Francisco board of appeals. We are joined by commissioner hurtado, commissioner frank fung, honda and chris function. To my left is robert brian and will provide the board with any legal advice tonight and mr. Pacheco the assistant and im cynthia goldstein, the executive director. We are joined by the City Department sthav cases before the board. Scott sanchez is here, hes the Zoning Administrator and representing the Planning Department and Planning Commission. Joseph duffy is here. Perfect timing. City and building inspector representing building inspection and john is here manager of the Public Works Bureau of street use and mapping. Mr. Pacheco at this time if you would go over the meeting guidelines and conduct the swear in process. The clerk requires that you turn off all cell phones. Appellants have seven 7 minutes for their cases and 3 minutes for rebut amounts people affiliated must include their comments in the three 3 minutes period. Members who are no
Quinscy lat mer and i live on Fourth Street a few blocks away from the site. I cant help but be outraged. I never heard Something Like this such blatant disregard for the law, the initial dust problem and the police having to called out working without permits and ignoring the stop work orders. It is crazy, if you dont take action here, you need to take action, i cant believe this is happening. I think that it is very least you can revisit the issue and see if there is anything that you can do under the law to bring him to justice. This is just crazy. Thank you. Thank you. Any other Public Comment . Okay, seeing no other Public Comment, commissioners, i believe that the inspector duffy would like to come back . Yes, please. Yes, commissioners, just in answer to your question regarding the Health Department, we found something on the city website that is the Health Department do have a Hazardous Waste Site Assessment and mitigation and it is mainly for leaking underground storage types