a second year dental student at the university of california of san francisco, i had the pleasure of working and meeting dr. kalika where we co-founded [inaudible] free orthodontic treatment, i know that a lot of people here today argue that it would not be beneficial to the sacramento neighborhood to have this medical service, i urge you guys and challenge you guys to look at it in a different way. there s no other dentist in the bay area that offers free orthodontic treatment to youth from starting in 2012, that s thousands of dollars that have been donated televising s youth here that had to leave because of the time, there are countless youth who have had their lives completely changed because of the efk to have orthodontic treatment with regards to many aspects of their life. i had multiple articles that were written in the work that he has done with the work sxh the impact he has made in their lives. he s the only orthodontist that takes free of charge children who have
they re very concerned about that and when they heard about this conversion and how it seemed to be done out of the offices, the co-change they implemented i think that raised concerns we invest painted and found this was not properly issued. do you have a documented permit history of what was there prior? i would say the permit history is not entirely clear i agree with the appellant to that extent but i don t have any evidence that there was a legal office use. i know that s something the appellant has argued and i can see those material ins their brief. so you say it was an art gallery for over ten years. from using google street view, it had been there last year and it was going back to 2004 or so, going back quite some time to the earliest 2008 or 2004, whatever the earliest google street images were and perhaps some of the local merchants can speak to that, three years is required as an abandonment of use. thank you. other questions? i think that argument si
they re very concerned about that and when they heard about this conversion and how it seemed to be done out of the offices, the co-change they implemented i think that raised concerns we invest painted and found this was not properly issued. do you have a documented permit history of what was there prior? i would say the permit history is not entirely clear i agree with the appellant to that extent but i don t have any evidence that there was a legal office use. i know that s something the appellant has argued and i can see those material ins their brief. so you say it was an art gallery for over ten years. from using google street view, it had been there last year and it was going back to 2004 or so, going back quite some time to the earliest 2008 or 2004, whatever the earliest google street images were and perhaps some of the local merchants can speak to that, three years is required as an abandonment of use. thank you. other questions? i think that argument si
wrongdoing by president obama contradicting president trump s allegations that susan rice broke the law. plus, more info about the investigation into trump team connections to russia. details about surveillance warrants against one of the president s campaign managers and why the fbi thought that adviser could be acting as a foreign agent. plus, it s the first rule of politics. don t compare anybody to hitler. i guess nobody told sean spicer. we didn t use chemical weapons in world war ii. you know? you had a you know, someone when s despicable as hitler who didn t sink to the to using chemical weapons. we ve got the latest on the attempts to clean that up and whether that will be enough for president trump. we want do get started with the breaking news on the trump administration charges of improper surveillance by the obama administration.
cnn is learning now about the claims of chairman devin nunes that members of the obama administration improperly requested the identiti
separating cia headquarters and langley very, very from washington mielgt as well be a political moat. we are one month in and he s already saying i m out. how alarming is that? it is alarming especially if it is flektireflective of the rd file. and a lot of people rely on them for national security. but it s an interesting window to what is probably going on inside the agency. one piece that gets back to the bannon issue, one of the things that really disturbed this officer was intelligence flows through the system and as phil mentioned quite correctly ends up in the hands of a political commissar who can repackage, and that s against anybody who s ever been an intelligence officer stands for, we need to get them to the senior most policymakers and to stand in the way of that is horrific. phil what did you think? substantively i think there are a couple offish issues that important. there s a lot of nervousness that goes beyond democratic and republican, his quick co