decide to punt this to the next administration and not make a decision. he would come under a lot of criticism for people who say you cannot say we need infrastructure and when he to cut red tape and speed up permitting and then have eight years of delay over a pipeline. on the other hand, you have a president who has made a rather historic commitment to fighting climate change and those things are opposites. host: thank you both for being part of newsmakers. you will see it is pretty healthy. perspective, they are at 6 billion. therful, which represents nation s of 4 billion. they have a $6 billion campaign going on right now. of facility,type to produce that type of system, we have to have that type of investment. the 17th president s go out and in, to sure that we expand. howard university interim president dr. frederick on the challenges facing the predominantly black university. tonight at 8:00 eastern on c-span s q&a. with current touch events from the nation s ca
are vested with discretion about what cases does brooke what case is appropraite. not only did they stop crime, isy also this challenging, given the state we are in in syria. to getis never too late right on that kind of issue. that is far better than continuing. opponent, as last his father dead we are way beyond that, this has spread, hundred 60,000 dead, millions displaced. 160,000 dead, the millions displaced. it will remain a tense and conflicted situation. the idea that he can kill this way kills hi way out of this thing is ridiculous. you mentioned a lot of inquiry. crimes andat war crimes against humanity in syria incenot exclusively the prov of the regime, that there have been other bad actors as well. if there, in terms of international law and in terms a judicial proceedings, distinction to be drawn between state actors and nonstate actors? in other words, if one could get would heds on one be subject to the same kind of procedures that the president of
the expectations we have of adoptive families, we certainly have an interest in avoiding a double standard, but it suggested for a subset, and probably a very small subset of adoptive parents, there may be a different standard. what do you think about the evidence that she is uncovered as to the rate of adoptive versus biological parents that are advertising on the internet? you know, it s hard for me to say because i don t know what the mindset was of these folks making these poor decisions. i do think that obviously when they adopted a child, they did not take that responsibility of becoming a parent in the way i think it was intended. certainly, i think it s important for laws to be clear how children, when they are placed outside a parent s home, what types of laws and regulations should guide that. that should be equally true. because it didn t happen in this instance, in this investigation, doesn t mean it s not possible. i think the fact that parents, whether adopted
to talk about what as long as elements are going to be part of it. also to strengthen the perception that justice will be here in the hope that we can deter some of the conduct, encourage people to desert, discourage people in the opposition for taking an eye for an eye. sure. in this respect, what would be your reaction, your advice, if in the fullness of time we re faced with the following proposition. president bashar al assad and 200 of his closest enablers are willing to leave syria forth with and bring an end to at least one phase of this conflict. in return for imunite from prosecution. is that doable under current conditions? is it unthinkable? first of all if we were actually presented with a proposition like this? well, first of all, i ve not seen any evidence that this guy, or the people around them, are ready to go. a hypothetical question. at any point. that s often what s presented here. well, if you gave the guy a bull tow or a place to go we coul