Stay updated with breaking news from Steve p. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
a primary edition of fox news at night. and breaking tonight, the former president now two for two, winning both iowa and anew hampshire, and no candidate has ever won both without also winning the nomination, and yet nikki haley says new hampshire is the start and not the finish, vowing to keep the campaign running, and to her credit, she beat expectations coming in about ten points of donald trump. we re live in bedford, is newhalfshire on how the president reacted. we headed back her to bedford to give a recap, but the president wusurrounded by lots of supports and chanting make america great again. het thought he had it it when we have talked to him on the ground at a polling location and called for nikki haley to drop out. watch. i want to thank everybody. this is fantastic state. this is a great state. you know we ve won new hampshire three times now a, three. we win it it every time. we win the primary. we win the generals. we ve won it, and it s a very, ve ....
parents rights. the chino valley school district will no longer be able to tell parents if their child changes their gender identity or pronouns after a judge had a temporary restraining order blocking the policy today. that came after california attorney general rob bonta s office sued the chino school district for the notification policy and they re now celebrating the judge s decision writing that it quote upholds the state s rights of our lgbtq plus student community and protects kids by harm by immediately halting the board s forced outing policy. while this fight is far from over, today s ruling takes a significant step towards ensuring the physical, mental and emotional well-being of inclusivity. now, the chino valley unified board of education president told fox news today they re disappointed by the ruling but that this battle is just beginning. saying, in part, quote, we can prevail as long as we stand united and strong against this agenda to marginalize paren ....
Steve, this numbers game, it s interesting. it seems like if you want democrats to vote for a majority position, a compromise position, look to those not running for president because the democratic party begins its process of picking a president in a way that helps progressives. you go to iowa. you know how it starts. you get in through nevada. there are some exceptions but basically and if you get to california soon enough now you re better off seeing on that left ward part of the track position that on the more centrist part, does that explain why all the candidates for president with the exception of joe biden who doesn t have a vote seem to realize the name of the game is get over to the left whether it s cory booker, get over on the progressive side of things. if there s a vote for trump s appointee to anything, vote against it. yeah, i mean, look, the split you re seeing, you saw this friday night in the vote to shut down in the first place, five democrats on friday night sa ....
Wing and he has to help people get re-elected. if he doesn t hold those democratic seats you mentioned like even ohio, pennsylvania, they look pretty good but montana, the others, certainly missouri, missouri, steve, you know the numbers before i do, trump is running 50%. he has support today with all that s gone on in the last year. he s riding high in missouri which makes claire mccaskill, i would think, worrisome. the other consideration that claire mccaskill has, this would be her third election, her third term if she wins this november. look at the past two and she got lucky. in 2006 it was a great democratic year nationally. she was part of that. in 2012 it was a more neutral year in missouri and looked like she was going to lose re-election. a red state. she drew that opponent in the general election who talked about legitimate, it went from what looked like an almost ....
Issue of prioritization away, you re looking at a pretty narrow, as it relates to the scope of immigration, you re looking at something pretty narrow. i know five years ago, eyou wer able to see this revolt on the right that kept comprehensive immigration reform from coming to a vote in the house. i m not sure in an election year where control of the house is at stake and republicans know it, i m not sure that can hold again this time. isn t it also true, steve, that it looks like mcconnell knowing mcconnell, and he s a republican down to his core, he s going to have to put something into that bill besides just the dreamers act. i think he ll have to put something on border protection just to give cover. in fact, balance to the bill. you think he ll get a clean bill? i suspect that s right because again, you heard chuck schumer there talking about the 60 votes, the idea of hey, this is probably whatever we come up with is going to need 60 votes. that means you can t just do it wi ....