but before that point, | there should be plenty of opportunity for cabinet ministers or others to have that vigorous - debate, probably in committee, - that s probably the best place to do it, and then for cabinet to sign off on those decisions - or to have further discussion if there isn t agreement. - robert, i wanted to ask you about your daughter, who was diagnosed with autism, i think, when she was ten. it s quite striking, isn t it, that fewer girls, fewer women, are diagnosed, than boys and men, and ijust wonder what your reflections on your own personal experience are, about that and what needs to change around that? ok, she was a bit younger than that, - but i still find it quite difficult - to talk about the moment i heard, | because part of me was relieved, | frankly, that the system was recognising there i iwas a condition and, therefore, | statutory services, statementing and all that was going to follow. but there was also part of me that was really, i | really upset, bec
why he did thing, especially when it comes to the violations. they re going to have to show his intentionality very high bar in the law. it is is. they re going to try to make him work for it. the reason is to have this deflection, this run around. what are you going to believe? we haven t heard the president say most of the things rudy guiliani has said. the problem with rudy guiliani s statementing, it puts him in position where he could be a fact witness if they were to investigate the president of the united states. now there was a conversation that was allegedly had, co-signed by the president. another where we didn t have a long one. didn t know what the president is going to say. now we have this conundrum where the president told him what to say and gave him wronging information or he didn t. now what are the fact in this case? giuliani continue to think he is covering the tracks of the president in the snow. every single footprint is being followed by investigators in
a lot of the mainstream projects i was working on have been indefinitely put on hold. reporter: daniels gives the interview less than 24 hours after we learned that michael cohen, personal attorney of the president, used his personal e-mail to communicate with stormy daniels attorney. michael cohen saying this is not a blockbuster development. he used his professional e-mail address to communicate for personal reasons all the time and released a statementing, i ll read part of that, saying, the use of my company e-mail to communicate with the bank and ms. clifford s former counsel proves absolutely nothing despite the less-than-convinced arguments offered by her former attorney. i used this e-mail address for virtually everything, as many people do. the attorney for ms. daniels is saying this is not the case, calling his bluff, calling mr. cohen s bluff, saying that this is further proof that he wasn t acting in a personal capacity or in a freelance capacity, but rather an officia
from alexandria. what s the latest on the investigation and what more are we learning about the suspect, james hodgkinson? reporter: fbi investigators were hard at work in alexandria all day yesterday, late in the evening they came you the with an statementing saying they recovered the two weapons. they believe both were acquired legally, possibly back in illinois where the shooter is from. they also recovered perhaps more importantly for the investigation, his laptop, his cell phone and a camera. this might help them determine any planning that might have taken place before the shooting and anyone he may have spoken to in the lead-up to this crime. one person not likely to be helpful to the investigation is the shooter s wife in illinois. she spoke to reporters yesterday and said she hadn t spoken to her husband since he left for d.c. in late march. did he explain to you or say
since the obama administration followed suit in september 2012. what has changed, however, is the intensity, scale and scope of the threats that face our nation. this is not the time to needlessly roll back and ha handicap our capabilities. a lot of people will use this hearing as an opportunity to talk about the committes russian investigation. i would like to remind everyone at702 is one of our most effective tools against terrorism and foreign intelligence targets. ahope my colleagues and those closely watching the hearing realize at the end of the day our constitutional obligation is to keep america and our citizens safe. the intelligence community needs 702 collection to successfully carry out its commission. and it s this committee s obligation to make sure that the ic has the authorities and the tools it needs to keep us safe