it s completely inconsistent with our constitutional tradition, and there s just no way that a court is going to accept that. the former president is attending the oral arguments tomorrow. do you think that s purely for fund fund raising purposes and he knows that s where cameras will be and he ll make a statement before, after or both or is there a legal strategy at play here in terms of some sort of maybe impact on judges? no. i don t think there s a legal strategy in play, and that s certainly that i think he s too small-mined to be able to think that through. i think what he s doing is he s seeking maximum attention. he s a narcissist. he thinks somehow that his presence can persuade people generally. i think that he s you know, i think he want to put on a show tomorrow, and i think he wants to put on a show that he s somehow being politically persecuted and that he s unfair lit victim of a witch hunt which we ve heard thousands of times.
Supreme-court
President
Way
Arguments
Tradition
Sort
Both
Judges
Strategy
Play
Terms
Cameras