Stay updated with breaking news from Statehouse senate. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
As cute as some of the attack this is a little bit long, but i would like you to remember this part. It is not how the strong man stumbles. The credit belongs to the man whose face is marred by dust and , who spendsd andelf in a worthy cause he. And who, at times, sales, but at so this place may never be with those who have never known victory or defeat. That says something about those who put themselves out to run thepublic office, whether highest level and whether it is the lowest in the county. Having said that, i would like to choose our guest. I will start to my extreme right. You a favorite son of South Carolina. Time inney who spent the house of representatives from the second district. The he also spent time at a gressional dont nation delegation in South Carolina. Now the senior senator from South Carolina. Arme ....
He was not using his own personal innuendo and i greatly enjoyed it and i hope you have more guests like that but he was right on target this morning. I am calling to say that i think like many people, cspan is wonderful but for criticisms i almost have none and i am a very partisan kind of person and you all do a tremendous job of showing just about every side of everything of the way people look at things in dc and elsewhere. I take my hat off to you. Continue to let us know what you think about the programs youre watching. We are live on this friday morning for another look at the Midterm Election outcomes and how they will impact states and local communities by the governing magazines where it is just getting started. To discuss some specific initiatives but right now i would like to start with the governors races. Youve been tracking bees and predicting the rankings for more than a year as youve done in several previous cyc ....
Decisions to make. Theres were not trying to force people into it or anything like that. But we certainly are encouraging those members that we know have skills and the capabilities to contribute to do so. You said that Coalition Allies will be sending several hundred additional trainers to iraq. But that number didnt make sense to me because thats pretty much what the pentagon is going to send over there are you saying 700 plus what the pentagon sends . Yes. On a have allies agreed cap, like this much and no snr not that im aware of, but you have to speak over the individual nation what theyre willing to contribute and not willing to contribute. You said the pentagon will be training 12bury gadse. Coalition members will be assisting us at the in this training, 12 total. No surprise, britain training some troop out there randomly . I can only speak for the United States mili ....
Well, i think the court by citing loving in windsor thinks that there is not much difference between marriage by a samesex couple and marriage by an interracial couple. They didnt decide the case but they cited it. The trend is certainly in that direction. I think the court its different from saying what loving stands for. Isnt the answer to my question about what happened in 1968 pretty obvious because we have baker in 1973. I think that lawrence, excuse me, that Justice Kennedy tells us something about how the court may be viewing these cases. I think what he is saying and i think you see it in lawrence and you see it in windsor. The court is saying that back decades ago, certain practices were accepted. Now we understand more about these things and we now understand that these are now going to be framed as discriminatory. We didnt know anything about samesex couples back at the at the time of loving. These were hiding because ....
So, unfortunately im constrained in what i can say, of course, about it. But what i can say is as in the Amnesty International case and in the Supreme Court, its plaintiffs burden to demonstrate and they failed to do so here, not only because their theory as subscribers of Verizon Wireless, which they cannot substantiate the District Court acknowledged theres no evidence that Verizon Wireless participated, but also because the injury that they assert is not based on the mere collection of metadata itself but the possibility that the government metadata to that compile information about the acvities of these particular plaintiffs. If there is an invasion of privacy by the collection of the metadata and ....