context of avoid, not pay for their responsibility. so with regard to how it affects it, though, it s early to tell, the federal bankruptcy court, which we saw early this year when he did the same thing, can delay a state proceeding. but i think when there s a delay, justice delayed would not be justice denied. again, very briefly, in the event you want to file bankruptcy protections, file them. they should be for legal purposes. the issue here is whether that was around a legitimate filing, and if not, if he s found responsible, he should pay up. the judge will have to approve, as i understand it, a bankruptcy. they ll probably look at all of these different things. he s tried this before. three smaller companies tied to jones declared bankruptcy earlier this year. i m actually curious just about the pain that these families have experienced because of some of the things that he has said. and will that be something the
“TRUMPISM & Toressism” seem to have the same political strategy when it comes to “admitting the truth and letting it be told” with the implementation of “lies, deflecting, gaslighting and
what s your argument? i think it s exactly in the constitution, the supremacy clause, the idea of separation of powers. it may go to the supreme court ultimately. we re going to win this. you can sfnot have a president subject to 5,000 local district attorneys who have a bone to pick or thels president would be interfered with by local magistrates. i think we re going to win. you know what i think? he s wrong and he s going to be reversed. they re not asking for him. they re asking for documents relevant for an investigation. you mentioned clinton verses jones. they said it did not raise that issue the idea of a state proceeding interfering with the office of president of the united states in a criminal process. so i completely disagree.
certainly not from the constitution. i think you don t have basis and you don t have an application. you re going to lose. what s your argument? i think it s exactly in the constitution, the supremacy clause, the whole idea of separation of powers. i this i we nk we going to win. we re going to win this. here s why. you cannot have a president subject to 5,000 local district courts w district attorneys wo have a problem with the president of the united states. i saw the district court s opinion. i think he s wrong and he s going to be reversed. they re asking for documents that could be relevant to you mentioned clinton v. jones. they say it did not raise that issue of clinton versus jones, the idea of a state proceeding