There is little doubt that the current legislation on ghost guns will be challenged in state or federal courts on constitutional grounds if it were to become law in Pennsylvania. The post Ghosts, guns and Quakers: The Pa. legislature’s Second Amendment gamble appeared first on Pennsylvania Capital-Star.
some agency. laura: well, and thomas and his dissent on the kind of companion case involving the healthcare workers, that was, you know, significant. it was four justices, so brent kavanaugh voted with the chief justice and the procurium majority opinion upholding the mandate. justice thomas wrote vaccine mandates fall squarely within state police power and until now only rarely have been a tool of the federal government. if congress had wanted to grant cms awght outer to authority to impose a nationwide mandate and alter the balance it would have said so clearly. it did not. professor, did he have it right? well this was a real close shave. they came within one vote of losing both cases and this is the outcome that some of us predicted because you could tell that kavanaugh and roberts did not feel as strongly about this
it s a smokescreen to hide the fact that the schools are failing our children, our teachers unions are failing our children in the mechanism for holding them accountable school board is holding them accountable in a way that makes them uncomfortable. , we have a two way marriage between big government and the one hand and the managerial class in our schools conspiring to lead both parents and her children but i will tell you the use of state police power to silence political opposition from accountability, that is something that would make our founding fathers shutter, it is a constitutional event and the fact that merrick garland, the leader of this effort actually has a son who is a vested financial interest in perpetuating and fuses a whole new meaning into the military industrial complex as applied to this domestic issue. jillian: that is certainly something we will continue to monitor, author of woke inc., thank you for joining us. have a great night. still to come details on more
supreme doubts. so much skepticism today from supreme court justices on the defense of marriage act. that act defines marriage as between a man and a woman. here s justice anthony kennedy considered the swing vote on this court. federal government is intertwined with the citizens day-to-day life, you are at real risk of running in conflict with what is always been thought to be the essence of the state police power which is to regulate marriage, divorce, custody. chief justice john roberts was also skeptical about the motivation behind the 1996 law. it was enacted to exclude same sex married, lawfully married couples from federal benefit regimes based on the conclusion that was driven by moral disapproval. it is quite clear in black and white and pages of the house