Warrants . The concern grows out of the fact that all of the failures and the and The Information that shouldved been given and wasnt given. And the question being what was the intent . What what washa their intention . Their motivation there. And what we determined was we couldnt definitively say what the motivation was. Are these pretty smart people . Fairly welleducated . At least welleducated. I dont know if theyre smart. I dont know if were very smart to beow honest with you. I was b going to say they have law degrees, right . At least somehe of them do. So you think the woods review for people at this level of the organization. To be clear, the stuff that didnt happen on the woods review was basic stuff. Yeah. You didnt need to be a deeplyexperienced fbi agent to be able to do it the right way. Well, thats my point. So wouldnt you think that would almost be muscle p memory for people who are going through this process to know they had an obligation to go through that . They clear
getting back to the section 80 section. no other ig has that limitation, by the way. so they can investigate their secretary, deputy secretary, administrator, whomever.y i just point that out because that s important to keep in mind as we get requests. and why are we different than the state department weig? the epa ig? couldn t agree with you more. couldn t agree with you more. do you agree that if true, giuliani s scheme isru alarming? i think s anything like that would be very concerning. and mr. giuliani recently returned to ukraine in search of dirt on the president s political rivals. apparently, in order to cook up a dossier of his own.n ri yesterday, he told reporters that president trump asked him to brief the justice department and senate republicans on what, if anything, he finds. do you and are you concerned that the justice department would coordinate with the president s personal lawyer on a scheme clearly designed to benefit the president s political campaign?le