Told me to tell you. To every man there comes a time in his life when he is figuratively tapped on the shoulder and offered the chance to do a great and mighty work, unique to him thats church hill. The reasonable man adapts himself to the world. The unreasonable man adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress is dependent upon the unreasonable man. Michael jordan was unreasonable enough to think that he could play in the nba even though he got cut from his high school team. Jesus christ was unreasonable enough to think through him being lifted up, all men could be forgiven for their sins. Barack obama was unreasonable enough to think he could do a good job for black folks, but he failed, but i digress. Donald trump and steve bannon are two of the most unreasonable people in the world. Steve bannon is unreasonable enough to think that the black vote, the black business community, the the latino, asian business community, has value. This guy is busy as heck all over the world,
More African Americans involved in the republican party. So, im going to introduce to you guys your speaker, but my friend. Some of you have heard me ask this in the past. There are a lot of new folks here. How many of you all consider yourselves reasonable people . Most of you all. You all are the wrong people. [ laughter ] how many of you all are familiar with George Bernard shaw, the british play right . Yeah, i had breakfast with him this morning, and heres what he told me to tell you. To every man there comes a time in his life when he is figuratively tapped on the shoulder and offered the chance to do a great and mighty work, unique to him thats church hill. The reasonable man adapts himself to the world. The unreasonable man adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress is dependent upon the unreasonable man. Michael jordan was unreasonable enough to think that he could play in the nba even though he got cut from his high school team. Jesus christ was unreasonable enough
How many of you are familiar with i had breakfast with him this morning. Here is what he told me. There comes a time in his life when he is figuratively tapped on the shoulder and asked to do a great and mighty work unique to him. No. Thats church hill. The reasonable man adapts himself to the world. The unreasonable man adopts the world to himself. Well open up the floor to some q and a, questions, not sermons, thats my job. And he wants a relationship with this room here. And if youre not willing to build a relationship with steve bannon and the movement that he is creating you should leave now. If you want to make America Great again and create opportunities for minority opportunities this is the train you need to ride. The train is leaving the station. Get your ticket. Lets bring out my buddy, steve bannon. Come on. [ applause ] thank you very much for having me today. I am here to open a discussion that some of you have been at my others. The central part of economic nationalism d
Reasonable people . Most of you all. You all are the wrong people. [ laughter ] how many of you are familiar with George Bernard shaw, the pl british playwright . I had breakfast with him this morning and hes what he told me to tell you. For every man there comes a time in his life when he is figure tiffly tapped on the shoulder and offered the chance to do great and mighty work unique to him. No, thats churchhill. The reasonable man adapts himself to the world. The unreasonable man adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress is dependent upon the unreasonable man. Michael jordan was unreasonable enough to think that he could play in the nba even though he got cut from his high school team. Jesus cries was unreasonable enough to think from him being lifted up all men could be forgiven for their sins. Barack obama was unreasonable enough to think he could do a good job for black folks but he failed. [ laughter ] donald trump and steve bannon are two of the most unreasonable peo
Lundquist and Safety Community help agencies go through that. There is a Police Accreditation coalition that brings tremendous resources. Some organizations do not have the capacity to support accreditation itself. Those help to help shepherd organizations. Should we require departments to develop a plan to reach accreditation . It is a pretty good the sort of Gold Standard of policing, that they aspire to. But should we rather than just encourage it, should we consider some system where we require departments at least to articulate a plan to get this way . I think a requirement is important, but also the way it is structured to review agencies, does not have investigatory authority, nor are we seeking that. In some ways, if you require it becomes regulatory, which i think prevents the integrity of the process from moving forward. I want to be cautious. I think incentives to support organization is important. A few things. I wonder if any witnesses have any suggestions on how we might