exclusive, and that s coming up first. plus a preview of trump s day in federal court this week with robert mueller s former top prosecutor andrew weizmann. also today, a conversation with congressman dan goldman. he knows a thing or two about making the case against donald trump. later, former cia director, john brennan joins us to discuss just how dangerous it is to handle our nation s most sensitive secrets like this. so we talk about a lot of issues on the show every week. we will definitely continue to do that. today, we have one focus. making sure you have a better understanding that the end of the show of the federal indictment of donald trump. the former president was back on the campaign trail yesterday attacking the special counsel and trying to muddy the waters as much as possible. the rhetoric from his supporters is getting increasingly violent, and his arraignment tuesday in miami could be a circus. so it s super important that everybody understands the facets of
december 31st, 1971. no lying up about your age. that actually happened. nominations are open until august 1st. but sooner you submit, the better. head to forbes.com to nominate someone today or nominate yourself. chief content officer of forbes media and editor, randall lane, thank you very much. it is now one minute past the top of the hour. the fourth hour of morning joe. and today is primary day across a number of southern states including georgia, alabama, arkansas and texas. in a moment, steve kornacki will break down the major races an update us on the republican senate race in pennsylvania that is headed to the courts i think. still too close to call. also ahead, the latest on the war in ukraine. where an ashamed russian diplomat quits over moscow s invasion. plus our conversation this morning with house speaker nancy pelosi. it was wonderful. willie. let s begin in georgia where polls open a just little over two hours ago. today s vote will have a major impact
jury come the jury is different than them whether it s political - them whether it s political conviction them whether it s political conviction or them whether it s political conviction or racial- them whether it s political - conviction or racial composition, whatever conviction or racial composition, whatever it conviction or racial composition, whatever it is conviction or racial composition, whatever it is. very conviction or racial composition, whatever it is. very very- conviction or racial composition, whatever it is. very very rarely. conviction or racial composition, | whatever it is. very very rarely is there whatever it is. very very rarely is there grounds whatever it is. very very rarely is there grounds for whatever it is. very very rarely is there grounds for overturning - whatever it is. very very rarely is there grounds for overturning a i there grounds for overturning a verdict there grounds for overturning a verdict because there grounds f
This. how do those conversations go in the intelligence of another country may have been compromised? unfortunately i have to have several of those awkward conversations with my counterparts in these countries. as a result of unauthorized disclosures, swinging a document or two documents goes out there, or somebody who decided to ignore their obligations that share these documents. never ever has there ever been somebody with such status, and stand a, and as the former president of the united states, with potentially responsible for that. now i m really concerned that our closest partners are really wondering just how shaky our system is. if a president of the united states treats their information, and we rely heavily on their sources, they re technical, they re human sources. when they see that it is left this way, unsecure, i really think this is going to give them some pause as far as continuing to provide the extent, in the depth of the
Emergency. that is almost a reverse of what we had a couple of years ago. another figure is that higher than that, into the 70s. americans have a comfort level with their economic situation. now, let s get to your point about some of the, shall we say, i don t know what in washington, d.c., well history says, well we re not talking about history. we re talking about the future. history said that president loses seats after in the off year. well the president gained seats in the on year. this president did not. but he won the election. he helped us hold the house. we helped him win the election. and those of our candidates or our members who won in a with trump on the ballot and won in the trump districts are in strong shape. but we want more. we have to offset some changes. but we want more. i feel i have absolutely no