the woman tasked with the landmark review of the english game told me it was time for a radical reform. we ve seen football lurch from crisis to crisis over the last decade or so. and unfortunately, we haven t necessarily had the right levels of regulation in place to stop that crisis from happening. i think we ve reached a point where people are saying, no more. crucially, crouch wants a powerful independent football regulator that would have stopped the attempt by the premier league s big six earlier this year tojoin the european super league. overseeing financial regulation, it could even block spending by owners deemed to be irresponsible. the regulator would enforce a beefed up owners and directors test for new buyers. other proposals include a transfer levy to get more money from the premier league to the rest of the game, reform of parachute payments to relegated clubs, and fan empowerment through shadow boards and a so called golden share. that would mean supporter consent ne
from the premier league to the rest of the game, reform of parachute payments to relegated clubs, and fan empowerment through shadow boards and a so called golden share. that would mean supporter consent needed over key decisions, such as a change of club name or stadium relocation, unlike in the past when wimbledon was infamously moved to milton keynes. and this season, a championship club that twice won the first division title in the 70s also fell into administration. derby county, for many, is sadly emblematic of a broken and unsustainable club system. one that encourages too many to overspend in the pursuit of promotion, and which shows why radical change is now needed to the way that clubs are both financed and run. criticised for allowing the controversial recent saudi takeover of newcastle united, the premier league said the reforms mustn t damage the game. but with the government likely to support crouch, football seems set for momentous change. dan roan, bbc news.
could even block spending by owners deemed to be irresponsible. the regulator would enforce a beefed up owners and directors test for new buyers. 0ther proposals include a transfer levy to get more money from the premier league to the rest of the game, reform of parachute payments to relegated clubs, and fan empowerment through shadow boards and a so called golden share. that would mean supporter consent needed over key decisions, such as a change of club name or stadium relocation, unlike in the past when wimbledon was infamously moved to milton keynes. and this season, a championship club that twice won the first division title in the 70s also fell into administration. derby county, for many, is sadly emblematic of a broken and unsustainable club system. one that encourages too many to overspend in the pursuit of promotion, and which shows why radical change is now needed to the way that clubs are both financed and run. criticised for allowing the controversial recent saudi
it was time for a radical reform. we ve seen football lurch from crisis to crisis over the last decade or so. and unfortunately, we haven t necessarily had the right levels of regulation in place to stop that crisis from happening. i think we ve reached a point where people are saying, no more. crucially, crouch wants a powerful independent football regulator that would have stopped the attempt by the premier league s big six earlier this year tojoin the european super league. 0verseeing financial regulation, it could even block spending by owners deemed to be irresponsible. the regulator would enforce a beefed up owners and directors test for new buyers. 0ther proposals include a transfer levy to get more money from the premier league to the rest of the game, reform of parachute payments to relegated clubs, and fan empowerment through shadow boards and a so called golden share. that would mean support a consent needed over key decisions, that would mean supporter consent needed over
by the premier league s big six earlier this year tojoin a european super league. overseeing financial regulation, it could even block spending by owners deemed to be irresponsible. is there a danger, though, that it makes investing in clubs here a less attractive proposition? i don t believe that anything that i do, or i ve recommended in this report, will deter investors from operating in english football. if anything, i think it would encourage investment, because we will have better regulation in place. the regulator would enforce a beefed up owners and directors test for new buyers. other proposals include a transfer levy to get more money from the premier league to the rest of the game, reform of parachute payments to relegated clubs, and fan empowerment through shadow boards and a so called golden share. that would mean supporter consent needed over key decisions such as a change of club name or stadium relocation, unlike in the past when wimbledon was infamously moved to milton