“No external alterations are proposed to the building or its curtilage and as such it is considered that the application proposal will have no material impact on surrounding heritage assets,” their agents told the council.
But here is what the public has said about the proposals: the comments are taken directly from the council’s planning portal.
Five Bells, Upwell
- Credit: Five Bells, Upwell
Mr John Mytton (Objects)
Comment submitted date: Sat 13 Mar 2021
Every time I have been in there it has been pleasant with no trouble in it will be a big lost to a very nice village and be thought out
“No external alterations are proposed to the building or its curtilage and as such it is considered that the application proposal will have no material impact on surrounding heritage assets,” their agents told the council.
But here is what the public has said about the proposals: the comments are taken directly from the council’s planning portal.
Five Bells, Upwell
- Credit: Five Bells, Upwell
Mr John Mytton (Objects)
Comment submitted date: Sat 13 Mar 2021
Every time I have been in there it has been pleasant with no trouble in it will be a big lost to a very nice village and be thought out
Letters to the Fenland Citizen editor: March 3, 2021
Signs could have been more clear for bridge-strike driver
Following your report in last weekâs Fenland Citizen of a bridge strike at the dive-under (newly re-opened) at Stonea level crossing â you may be interested by the signs that the errant driver must have seen when approaching it.
Some distance away, a large sign warns drivers of the general situation (photo 1), but the old height limit has been merely masked over, and the height limit is now shown by a sign about half a metre above the grass.
Drivers do not usually expect to see a permanent road sign so low down. Closer to the hazard, another large sign tries to inform drivers about the âbridge headroomâ but, as shown by photo 2, this sign is also not located in an ideal position.