Surging as high as $2861, but within a few hours it crashed to $0. it s thought that the creators cashed out, effectively stealing around $2.1 million from investors, but the technology website gizmodo actually says it could be closer to $3.38 million. so what was it? squid, as it was named, was built as a token to be used in a new online game that was expected to go live this month and, as you mentioned, it was inspired by the popular korean series which is based on a deadly tournament comprising of children s games, but experts do say there were a number of signs that this was a scam from the very beginning. gizmodo and coinmarketcap said that potential investors should be warned mainly because the now defunct website was filled with spelling errors, social media accounts promoting the digital asset have now disappeared and another big red flag
Live next month. as you mentioned, it was inspired by the popular korean series which is based on a deadly game. but experts say there were a number of signs that this was a scam from the very beginning. gizmodo said that potential investors should be warned, mainly because the now defunct website was filled with spelling errors. social media accounts promoting the digital asset have now disappeared and another big red flag was that investors could only buy it, not sell squid. this is being called something called a rug pull which means the cryptocurrency creators cashed out coins in exchange for real money quickly and that devalues the cryptocurrency s value. 0ne expert bbc spoke to said this can be quite common in the crypto world especially when there is little regulation. squid game of causes netflix s
Doesn t actually say what any of that evidence is or what he found. he says it all looks bad. you ll recall this is the same so-called audit that kicked off in wisconsin with this special counsel requesting sensitive election documents from clerks all over the state. his initial demand for documents came from a gmail address that populated everybody s emails as john delta. he issued subpoenas requesting every single documented related in any way to the will ex-. he subpoenaed that from county clerks and from the mayors of large cities in wisconsin, subpoenas riddled with glaring errors, including spelling errors and being addressed to the wrong people. ef demanded officials in wisconsin must meet with him in private for an interview, which is not a thing in terms of the way subpoenas work. nevertheless, he demanded private interviews by these sort of subpoenas and people ares supposed to durn u disturb up for the interviews at an office that is like a shared working
Green screen that served as his backdrop, and he says that he has definitely started to see signs of things that look like maybe evidence that the election was definitely rigged. doesn t actually say what any of that evidence is or what he found. he says it all looks bad. you ll recall this is the same so-called audit that kicked off in wisconsin with this special counsel requesting sensitive election documents from clerks all over the state. his initial demand for documents came from a gmail address that populated in everyone s emails as john delta. who s john delta? he went on to issue subpoenas requesting every single doument related in any way to it. he subpoenaed that from county clerks and from the mayors of large cities in wisconsin, subpoenas riddled with glaring errors, including spelling