That defined what progressivism is said one of the first to use that to sell to identify. He was the United States senator that was recognized by his peers in the 50s as one of the five greatest in American History in a proponent of world war i, he stood his ground to advocate for free speech. He was about the people. After the civil war america changed radically from a nation of Small Farmers and producers and manufacturers and by the late 1870s 1870s, eighties and nineties we had concentrations of wealth and inequality and concern about the influence of money and government. He spent the later part of the 1890s giving speeches all over wisconsin 51 to the speaker for your groupon bob would give a speech. County bears, every kind of event that you can imagine. And by 1900 he was ready to run for governor advocating on behalf of the people. He and had an issue of the direct primary no more electing candidates at conventions. Number two, a stop the railroads. The assistant attorney gene
Think that it will increase my skills and so we would say yes that makes sense and sometimes we dont. In terms of the flow of partnerships and information back and forth, ive been very public about saying for the National Security agency i would like us to create a model where the members of our workforce dont necessarily spend 30 or 45 years working directly for us which has been made historic norm. Its amazing when i say tell me how long youve been with the nsa. 30, 35 years, 38 years. I said goodbye to an employee after 50 years. When ive talked about is particularly given the state of the technology, we have to create a world where evil from nsa can leave for life and work in the private sector provides also like to create a world where does private sector can come spend a little time with us because one of the challenges is the nation that we are dealing with and you have seen this play out over the last year or so in particular. We talk past each other a lot because we dont under
Irrigated lawns, and we had a deer herd living in downtown boulder. When the lions moved in, they were in the open space, then they discovered there was deer in town. In the lions discovered they could eat dogs and cats. That is food for them. So the lions were learning, and they have learned, that this is where they will find food. Yes, there is food up there, too, there is lots to eat in town. This is a retreat, beautifuly an a place for enrichment, enlightenment, and coming together. The people who were intended to be the audience were really what we would call the middle class. The programs were very similar. A combination of speakers of the day, also a variety of both what we might consider highbrow and lowbrow entertainment opera, classical music, and probably what wed be considered fulfill of that day. Watch all of our events from boulder on book tv, and also American History tv on cspan 3. Next, with the u. S. Is doing to prevent more cyberattacks. Then, Homeland Security jeh j
Remarkable, a coming together of all of these federal agencies working seamlessly together. To give you an example, when we have the denial of service attacks that were hitting our financial institutions, we were was working to these were bot nets. The fbi was reaching out to their counterparts. There is a lot of noise out there. What we did, and this is unique. To state department decided do. I was thought it was a bad thing. You can have a positive, where you say i need your help on something, i want you to elevate this. For about 20 countries, we said, this is serious. We want your help. We want to build a cooperative framework to deal with these threats. That has been part of our mission, working with the other agencies. More and more countries are taking this seriously. Is not just a technical issue. That is another transformation. , you would to go in person, youlk to a are the tech, you deal with it. Now, people understand it is a National Security issue. Human rights issue, for
, in themy question energy sector, we dont differentiate between physical threats and Cyber Threats. We drill with the assumption that they will probably do both at the same time if it is a sophisticated attack. To be frank, the militarys response in its own protection seems to be focused on isolation as a tactic for dealing with the idea of the grid going down. I wonder if you could talk to that a little bit. As tempting as isolation is as a strategy for response, it also potentially makes security a lot more difficult if you have individual grids all over the place. If you could talk about isolation versus integration. Isolation works at a tactical level for immediate shortterm periods. It is not a comprehensive, sustainable strategy. It is this idea of, i will just shut the network down. It is not that it is a bad thing at the tactical level. If you are looking at a base, an installation as opposed to an entire grid or sector. In the long run, i think the right answer for us is goin