To note is there are 11 different design styles that are on this one block of parker, so the notion that theres a consistency or somehow theres a vocabulary that can be identified is just is just not true. I see art deco, classical, edwardian, english, storybook cottage, new england cottage, spanish, and storybook, all on one block. You can go anywhere in San Francisco, and while there may be important people that lived here, architecturally, theres nothing different about this structure than those on other 25foot lots. Thats a standard in the city. What i think is true is that there is a jordan parks file, but it just doesnt happen to be on parker avenue. On commonwealth, the next block over, jordan, and palm, the upper picture shows sort of grand houses developed in the 1920s. Theyre all set back equally, theyre all two stories over basement. They all are set back equally from the street. They all have larger lots. A lot of them have garages in the back, they have side yards. This is
I believe that statistics and ill check with robin, over 43 . 43 at stewart hall. And i think 40 at Convent High School and then, i dont have specifics but its in the mid20 at the elementary. Thats total. Percentage . The percentage relates to total students of colour . Yes. Commissiocommissioner moore . Thank you. This made the school not just a document but real as part of this community, including the importance of the people it shapes. Im in strong support and make a motion that we approve this condition together with a modification of the meeting at an enrollment cap of 1,000 is reached. Second. Commissioner moore, could you please repeat the amended part of the motion, the amended commissions . Could you repeat them, please. That we encourage to make part of the motion a special meeting when the enrollment cap of 1,000 students is being reached. Thank you. On that motion, then, commissioners, to approve this matter with conditions as have been amended and read into the record, co
Commissioner moores comments on this. Were definitely seeing this trend and i believe we will see it Even Stronger as we move to the future. Ideally this would be housing. We are seeing it even with 80 used a. D. U. S in some of the neighborhoods. I think it is a great idea to look at this broadly and encourage housing where we can get it. I moved to approve. Second. Commissioner moore . To take this further, thank you for your support. What we would also need to look at is where is line or space possible because the report speaks about activating straight friends through greening and active uses. This particular garage, which is simply a garage would continue to be one. It is not really a visual transformative adaptation here, but we should think about that as well as we move forward. If there was nothing further, there was a is a kept motion that has been seconded with conditions. [roll call] so moved. That motion passes unanimously 5 0. That will place us on your discretionary revie
Residential building at 399 free monfreemont and a portion is sitting empty everyday. Because of the configuration of the garage and the fact that it of course tends underground, it really isnt feasible to convert in unused space to, for example, residential uses or any other active uses. For reference, udr is proposing to convert a portion of the parking garage at another one of its buildings, directly adjacent to this one throug to add to thg garage area but thats not feasible here. So the sponsor would like to put this garage to better use by making about 30 Spaces Available to the public and relieving some of the unmet demand for parking in the hill neighborhood. The Planning Commission has previously approved similar nonaccessory parking uses for udrs buildings at 388 beil, and the sponsor worked with pdi to oversee the operations, manage reservations, collect revenue and ensure tax payments are made to the city and they propose for the past successful relationship with p ci, as w
Have gone online to see what has been done, we noticed that there have been things that have been changed in the plans. I know maybe there is some argument that there has been some community input. I can tell you there is a large number of people here that have not had the impotent that is what we are looking for. What were asking from you is a postponement in this Decision Just so we can meet and talk with the developer so that we can have some say in terms of the small impacts whether it be setbacks, that is kind of what we are looking for. At this point, you can look at the plans and notice again, for some instants, some of the members here architects and they mentioned there is a possibility of a setback. Small things that could possibly be incorporated into the projects. That is what we are asking for. In ending, the staff, in terms of objectives, indicated that i think its on page 32 of the report, section 8. 4, ensuring that the streets and alleyways maintain their intimacy and