outside the courthouse in wilmington, delaware, and haven t used spoke with juror number ten. tell us what he told you that s right. jake, juror number ten, who we spoke to with without showing his face. he was concerned about his safety. one of the things he told us was that very quickly, very, very very early in the case. he had a pretty good idea of where this case was going, but he said he wasn t 100% sure on tv, heard all of the evidence, listen to what he said was with the crucial part of the prosecution s case when you look at the form, are are you a drug addict? are you an unlawful user of drugs and he said no clearly he lie jake? there was five days of prosecution evidence, mountains of evidence, overwhelming these jurors trying, to drive home the point that he was addicted to drugs and the defense really tried to focus on the days around when he bought this gun in october 20, 2008 ten and it s clearly that did not really make an impact for these jurors. we als
do it to me makes it it really sort of difficult to have any sort of good thought about it because, you know, i assume the judge has other cases. if he hears a little bit on one day from this defendant and then hears the rest of the day about 10 other defendants and then a couple days later he has something else. it doesn t you know, it doesn t seem to me like to be a very efficient or even very reassuring for a defendant. not at all, greta. and we have heard one common word to describe the mexican legal system, and that being unpredictable. and we have to remember that because the judge controls so much of the legal process and the cases before him. acting not only as the soul decision maker but also as the fact finder and investigator that the process in and ever itself is so unpredictable because it s up to each individual judge of when they want to hear certain pieces of evidence. which is very much a problem for the defendant, who, in this case, is just sitting in jail and, re