politics i am the president, but i am also a dad joe biden, in the complicated pander and chief candidates for reelection and concern father as his son sits inside of delaware courtroom facing criminal charges brought by it biden, justice department plus file and error. donald trump s conviction on criminal charges rallies republicans to his side while democrats are divided on this question, is branding trump with a convicted felon label, help or hurt their chances at stopping has returned to the white house and capitol hill flash at this hour, republicans are grilling dr. anthony fauci on his tough and controversial decisions during the covid pandemic. i m dana bash so let s go behind the headlines and inside politics we start right now. we are going to go right up to capitol hill and we re going to get into that hearing. marjorie taylor greene is questioning dr. anthony. good okay. we ll we ll take that as a you don t know what you represent. this as director of the nih
Again, in that group of nine voters, five of them said that this made them less likely to vote for him. and in fact the majority of the group was going to go biden so i just i think that republicans are circling the wagons. they know that being a convicted felon will have an effect on marginal swing voters. and so they re doing their best to build a narrative that this is good for trout, sorry, i just sometimes people i m sorry to interrupt. i just want to play for our viewers some of the focus group that you re talking about nothing s move in the middle. middle for me, trump is unfit for office, and so i ve got the trial highly politicized, but in the hands of the jury, both sides had the chance to present their case. and that s ultimately how it should have been done. i don t believe i would stand up in a sale bomb over $60 when when they put me all over the news for exactly what we saw on the news yesterday so
Messaging isn t really necessarily getting through without outside of his own base. so new york hush money case was mainly about enforcing laws fairly to uphold the rule of law that is the majority anterior, 52%, although a pretty high hi percentage, 46% believed that these charges in this case was politically motivated to hurt donald trump. but again, the majority position here was that this case and the outcome was about enforcing laws to fairly uphold the rule of law. of course, there is a big political split on this. all right, the new york hush money case was mainly a politically motivated attempt to hurt trump. look at this large percentage of republicans. my goodness, gracious 87% believed that that was so trump has certainly locked down his base. that s a big reason why he was able to raise all of that money. but the fact is independence and democrats don t bite independence 44% believed that in fact, the new york hush money case was mainly a political, politically motivated at
Donald trump has said that he doesn t care if he goes to jail, that he would be portrayed as the white nelson mandela. now, anyone who knows donald trump knows the donald trump might say that he wants to be the white nelson mandela, but he doesn t want actually do any of the things that nelson mandela did. and donald trump himself is a germaphobe. the idea of him going to jail at all, he wouldn t even use the restroom when he was in court all day long because it was a one communal restroom because he thought it was disgusting. so serious, you got there for user the first day he walked in and he went and then he defines the restroom. now, can i say that every single day there hasn t i don t know oh, i don t want to say this conversation took a turn point in the dermal phobia is not somebody that we know anytime in prison. okay. let s look at the other side of the aisle. yes. and democrats and the fact that they are trying to figure you re up particularly based on how we started th
Judge did not require jury unanimity is just not true. the jury unanimously agreed was asked unanimously agree that trump falsified business records. unanimously agreed that he did so with the intent to commit another crime which had to be unanimously agreed to be a violation of state election law. what the judge said they did not need to be unanimous on was the so-called unlawful means by which he intended to violate that election law. so there was a non unanimous component, but the key parts of that verdict had to be unanimous. and he the judge went through each individual juror as after the foreman delivered the verdict, and they all agree that they support all of the verdict it s on all 34. another claim is that donald trump can ask the supreme court to step in he s made that claim. apparently, others, even the house speaker, is that even possible? this is a state issue. it would be wildly unprecedented because this is a state issue. i m loath to offer a definitive fact check