a two hour edited version of the ceremony full of many moments like this. and the winner of the bafta for best actor goes to. ..cillian murphy. the bafta. the bafta goes to. ..emma stone. and the bafta goes to. ..oh, i can read it, oppenheimer. we didn t feel the need to issue any spoiler alerts before showing those clips as they date from last weekend. but that was very much an issue for some newswatch viewers, including dave griffiths. watching the baftas last sunday, 25th february and waiting for the best actor, best actress to be announced when both my wife and is bbc app decided to ping. so while waiting for the next award to be presented, i looked at mine only to find out that the best actor and best actress had been announced on the bbc app some 15 minutes before those who were watching the programme got to find out. well, another viewer who got in touch with us about this was paul kirkwood to let speak to him now. thank you so much, paul, for coming on newswatch. tell
prostate condition last week. the prime minister had been informed of the diagnosis and the news that - we re bringing you this evening in advance. i many of you wrote in to complain that too much airtime had been given to too little information, and that it was an invasion of the king s privacy. sylvia franklin emailed. stuart reynolds told newswatch. the bbc has been reporting that since taking the throne, king charles has determined that the modern royal family must be more open about medical matters while still preserving some privacy. his recent visit to hospital for an operation on an enlarged prostate was disclosed to the media, and journalists were also briefed about the princess of wales hospital admission for abdominal surgery around the same time. this new openness is a world away from the information the media was given when king charles s grandfather, george the sixth, developed lung cancer in the late 19405 around the time charles was born. the word cancer wasn
after day of this item leading news bulletins is excessive . the situation is obviously of great concern to the bbc, but, surely, as he cannot be named untilfurther investigations are undertaken, this should be given less prominence than other news about the economy, the effects of climate change, and the war in ukraine . and david robinson suggested, report the facts when they are available and stop adding to the frenzy around who it is . who it was, was revealed on wednesday s news at six as culture editor katie razzael described. katie razzell described. this will come as a huge shock to viewers. we ve had a statement within the last few minutes from vicki flint, who is the wife of huw edwards, who named him as the bbc presenter facing allegations and said about her husband that, he was suffering from serious mental health issues and is now receiving in patient hospital care . later that evening, other bbc news outlets aired new allegations about huw edwards, and the co
you air with caution. the idea is, is that even when it is rough, the wind and the waves will come over and they could sweep you out to sea. and it s hard in this weather to try and find anyone. so please, if you do come down or if not, please just steer clear of the sea if you can. well, the rain is here and the strong winds have already started to arrive. and the sea is on its way in. and the real warning is around coastal areas with large waves and debris posing a risk to life. professor lucy easthope was one of a number of viewers concerned about that juxtaposition between the rnli s warning to steer clear of the sea and the piece to camera that followed immediately. this is utterly disgraceful. the dissonance it creates can kill people. explain yourself, bbc news. and john from cheshire recorded a video with his thoughts on the matter. are those who control the bbc of the view that oral warnings cannot comprehend be comprehended by members of the public unless accompan
and was echoed by the likes ofjacob rees mogg. well, i think it s over baked. i think they want to find the worst at every possible opportunity. and i think it shows a degree of vindictiveness that does not work to the committee s favour or advantage. the space provided on the bbc for the former prime minister and his supporters to reject the report s conclusions annoyed william riddell graham, who emailed, the 30 or so mps who support johnson should not be granted the same air time and the same deference as the hundreds of meps, including many conservatives, who will support the report . the bbc should seek balance, but when that quest for balance means that you are talking to eccentrics like fabricant and doris, then that quest becomes almost equivalent to a bias . that charge had already been levelled last friday when, before anyone else had seen its conclusions, borisjohnson dismissed the committee that investigated him as a kangaroo court. so, did the bbc allow this pr