minister about what is happening with the hostage negotiation and the gaza war as well as the latest attacks by iran-backed proxy groups. but, first, the world is awaiting president biden s response to the death of three american soldiers from a drone attack in jordan, blamed on iran proxy terrorists. the president says he has made a decision but is not saying what that is. chief national security correspondent jennifer griffin starts us off tonight live from the pentagon. good evening, jennifer. good evening, bret. it s unclear if the iranian proxy group had knowledge an american drone was returning to the base at the same time it chose to attack or if it was coincidence. officials still don t know if the drone was launched from iraq or syria. president biden says he has made his decision on how to respond. i don t think we could be any more clear that we have called on the iranian proxy groups to stop their attacks. they have not. and so we will respond in a time and ma
with me. i will see you at the end of tomorrow. tonight on all in. trump s actions are unprecedented. the supreme court concluded that the district court judged right. he did engage in insurrection. colorado s highest court disqualifies trump from the primary ballot. tonight an exclusive with the head of the group that just won this enormous case. plus the stakes for trump s candidacy and his january six trial date and his fate rests in the hands of the united states supreme court, mired in scandal. right now what is the compensation of a justice of the supreme court? oh, goodness. i think it s plenty. [laughter] new reporting on the money woes of clarence thomas and just who has been lavishing him with gifts. i feel like i should quit while i m ahead. when all in starts, right now. good evening from new york. i m chris hayes. we have a stunning bit of unprecedented news out of the state of colorado tonight. it comes at an unprecedented time, with an unprecede
you here. that s tonight reidout. all in with chris hayes starts right now. tonight on all in. trump s actions are unprecedented. the supreme court concluded that the district court that right. he did engaging insurrection. colorado s highest court disqualifies trump from the primary ballot. tonight an exclusive group ahead of the group that just won this enormous case. but plus the states for trump s candidacy and his january six trial date in his fate rests in the hands of the united states supreme court, mired in scandal. right now what is the compensation of a justice of the supreme court? oh, goodness. i think it s plenty. a [laughter] new reporting on the money was of clarence thomas and just who has been lavishing him with gifts. i feel like i should quit while i m ahead. when all in starts, right now. good evening from new york. i m chris hayes. we have a stunning bit of unprecedented news out of the state of colorado tonight. it comes at an unpreced
. good to be with you, i m katy tur, former vice president mike pence is putting up a fight. a moment ago in minnesota, he told reporters he is pushing back on special counsel jack smith s subpoena requiring him to testify about january 6th. pence is citing the speech and debate clause, something normally reserved for sitting lawmakers. my fight is on the separation of powers. my fight against the doj s subpoenas very simply is on defending the prerogatives that i had as president of the senate to preside over the joint session of congress on january 6th. for me, this is a moment where you have to decide where you stand and i stand on the constitution of the united states. yesterday if you were with us, you would have heard former federal prosecutor paul butler tell us that argument, that speech and debate clause would be a good academic paper for a law student but not as good of an argument in court. after all, pence was not a legislator, technically. he was vice presi
bring out pence! bring him out! bring out pence! bring mike pence! bring mike pence! [ chanting ] much of today s testimony centered around john eastman, an attorney whose theory that the vice president had the authority to nullify the election outcome so laughable that donald trump s own aides, allies and closest advisers described dismissing it outright. here s that evidence. made clear with mr. meadows about you and the vice president having a different view about the authority on january 6. i believe i did. did he explit sy or tacetly agree with you or say that makes sense or okay? i believe that that mark did agree. what makes you say that? i believe that s what he told me. but as i mentioned i think mark told so many people so many different things that it was not something that i would necessarily accept. that s okay why that s resolved. i see. tell me what he told you on this topic. you know the vice president doesn t have a broader role.