Page 4 - Sjoa News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Sjoa. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Sjoa Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Great and brave men and women of i.c.e., do not worry or lose your spirit, you are doing a fantastic job of keeping us safe by eradicating the worst criminal elements. so brave the radical left dems want you out. next it will be all police. zero chance. it will never to happen. quote, crime would be rampant and all controllable if democrats got what they wanted. outfront now, friend of the president s for 15 years. former republican gubernatorial candidate in new york. and joan walsh, national affairs corporate. joa correspondent. joan, president trump is happy to take on this issue. you ve got chuck schumer, bernie sanders, they re not jumping on this train. right. are democrats making a mistake politically? well, as you just said, it s not democrats generally, it is a portion of the party. i happen to be in that portion of the party, erin. ....
Initiated this or provoked it, it is rather the victim who provoked it. i think the facts testified to leave both inferences equally valid. there are facts to support both and that is the reason i think the instruction should be given to the jury. they re free to arg argue, that, what the defendant did either does not constitute provocation or the victim did all the provocation. i think the facts, as testified to by the eye and ear witnesses as well as the defendant s own statements and let me add to the fact that when you add on top of that, that the defendant s own statements, some of them have been shown to be materially, a, inconsistent with one another, and b, false, that those are inferences the jury could make that the defendant provoked this initial encounter. i m sorry. we had that argument sort of at the joa. ....
Was correct. if it results in death it can indeed be third degree murder and the defendant is entitled to such an instruction to the jury and onto the next page after si corroboration in that ca case after citation in that case. we find the failure to give the instruction to have been reversible error. the next case is j-a-k-u-v-o-w-s-k-i. which is a second district court of appeal decision from 1986. again, here we have a third degree felony murder. in that case, the victim was 6 years old. based on underlying felony of child abuse. and in that case, the defendant was charged both with second degree murder and third degree murder. after deliberation, the court apparently, under joa as to second agreeing murder and after deliberations the jury convicted of third degree murder based on ....
the court didn t address that argument in the joa. and i don t know if the court intends to draft an order specifying why the state, in the court s opinion, had met it s burden. however, what mr. mantei just said isn t the law. not even close to the law. and it s not factually support ed by the witnesses that he claims now he can use to support this notion of provocation. celine bahador, if the court will recall, for the first time ever, came up with this story in court there was some sort of vague movement from left to right, which would suggest in some sort of vague way that people, not necessarily trayvon martin or george zimmerman, but somehow people she thinks might have moved in a direction toward this in the direction of and we know where her house is. it s the third one down. ....
Your response to that? well, number one, they obviously have the right to bring on other witnesses after the defense puts on their case, number one. number two, i think it was pretty strong when you listen to the directed verdict arguments today. it was very powerful, some of the things that the attorney said in representing the state s interests in doing so. it was very pointed and very clear. but also, too, when the judge made her ruling, she made it very clear that improving the case for second-degree murder, that she believed that the state had put on both direct evidence and circumstantial evidence supporting the case and the charges. i think many people though know joa, judgment of acquittal, is procedure at best and that was anticipated that this judge, you know, would toss out the defense argument that there s not enough evidence. but let me move on, on an emotional level, you re in touch with the family, sir. we saw sabrina martin testify early this morning, this ....