she has no family on the rolls, she has built in negation of indian ancestry anywhere in her lineage. tucker: and yet she represented herself as one for years and was promoted on the basis of her claim that she was an american indian. she also has this story which you just repeated the other day about her parents being subject to the racism of the timesab because one of the most part native american. what do you know about that? is that true? i don t believe it s true, but they were married by a prominent minister and a town just maybe 15 miles away. he was prominent enough that he basically put that religion in oklahoma and he helped found a college there in that religion. i don t think he would have done a wedding for two kids that ran away and eloped and their parents didn t approve. also elizabeth warren s father
thousands have lived here for decades under that status. those people say removing their status would be racist. lee guillen is deputy director and he joins us from new york. as i understand it, you re upset that texas is following federal law? we re not upset that texas is following federal law, we don t think they re following federal law. that s one of our claims. what we are concerned about is that the trump administration is not going to have localities enforcing immigration law. these are not trained individuals, they don t always want to do it. they don t have the resources. one myth is that they are not doing it when they are serious criminals and their localities. what they don t want to do is become regular immigration agents going after people whose visas have expired. tucker: we have taken this off the table as a culture, as a cable tv world, but if someone is here illegally, why shouldn t
then hold a hearing which would decide whether or not i could be allowed in class, period. tucker: why do you go to this school? why does anybody go to this school or any other school? what are you getting out of this exactly? i initially went for athletics my freshman year, but that s a long gone dream now. i m pretty much just stuck here. tucker: man, i wish i could hire you, i would encourage youi or anyone else to join the workforce. it s not worth it. this is a joke. it s a bubble, we are all going to realize that in ten years. you are a brave man for coming on. appreciate it. thank you. thanks, tucker. tucker: elizabeth warren is continuing to assert and flaunt her native identity. a cherokee genealogist looked into it and says the whole thing is pure nonsense. it s kind of offensive actuallyf she joins us next. risk of stroke due to afib,
it s not either/or. feminism taught us that what hurts one sex hurts us all. that applies to women and it applies to men. there is a particular working, especially blue-collar crisis, among men. if we can at least take some of the gender politics, ironically, out of the discussion about what s happening to men, perhaps we can start to treat them as people. tucker: the conversation appears to have moved from what you just said, they thrive when each is thriving to a zero-sum understanding where my loss is your gain and vice versa. when did that change? you could argue with second wave feminism in the 1970s, but that s a long time ago. i would say obviously it s true it s still politically incorrect to talk about the crisis among men. if you read a lot of liberal publications, they will put the
in rural america that we associated with cities. it s about wages. it s pretty clear from the data. why aren t our policymakers responding to this? first of all, we have to agree that it s a crisis. imagine 90 lambeau fields, 90 stadiums full of men missing in action from our workforce. we have a concept of a problem. obviously this has a terrible effect on men, men are far more likely to want to work and therefore far more likely to bef depressed when things aren t working out. if we can at least agree on those basic facts, which we know from a myriad of studies, i think it s a good starting place. tucker: there seems to be resistance on the part of policymakers, even to acknowledge the problem as if, and this is just a guess, it s somehow an attack on women to acknowledge that there is a male employment crisis. politics seem to play a role. definitely plays a role and so does our culture and of course, that s silly. you can care about women and you can care about men.