Thanks for having me. That is all in on this thursday night. Good evening, alex. Amazing, were talking about the word contraception as something thats being litigated in the United States of america. Were going to have more on that later on our show as well. Thank you, my friend. And thank you for joining me this hour. Today we got the news that Donald Trumps one criminal case, the one criminal case that was likely to go to trial before the november election, may be delayed. Manhattan District Attorney alvin brags Hush Money Case was set to go to trial on march 25th, less than two weeks from today, but now that date is in question. Now, trumps legal strategy in all of his cases has been to push them off as long as possible, preferably until the month of nevuary. But todays delay is not coming from trump, or at least not directly. Today d. A. Braggs office consented to a 30day delay in the start of trial, but not because d. A. Bragg needs another month. Theres a new trove of records tha
law is misuse of government position, that you re misusing your position in government to personally profit somehow. and she s not doing that in this case because she could say i m just wearing the clothes. i m not overly marketing the clothes. if i were, that s a different story. and her company did actually get in trouble for that earlier this year. in july of 2016. this is when they did market it. they tweeted from her twitter account, shop ivanka s look from her rnc speech and put up the link so that you could buy her dress. so, that is actual crossing the line. that could be construed as crossing the line. that could get them in trouble. in these later cases the wall street journal profiles it s really just about selecting a clothing line. you have to put this in greater context. she s a marketing genius. this is what she grew up with. this is what she did before she joined the white house. she know what is she wears will
kardashianing of the white house? meaning brand. like just always pump the brand with whatever appearance you re doing, with all of your social media posts? i think that s what troubles people when they see this kind of activity. they don t want to be questioning whether or not the president or the first daughter is doing something for the brand instead of for the country. they don t want to have that question sort of ever present and to walter s point so long as they continue to own doesn t matter if it s in a trust, so long as they continue to own, they open themselves up to this kind of questioning. it s not going to go away so long as their ownership stays. to your point, you really can t separate ivanka from her brand. if you look at her web page for her products, it says it targets the working women who wears many hats. you look at her instagram feed from the white house and she s doing everything from putting her children to bed to talking about tax policy. it s very consist
macy s said shop ivanka s link to her rnc speech. hard to say this was a random mistake and that time they said we ll give the money to charity. they knew this wasn t the right thing to do. of course, they knew. to what everybody has been saying about these kids, they are not stupid. she knew exactly what she was doing and here is the reason the apology is not enough, erin. this just skims the surface of what could be a complete and total and dangerous and broad and in depth conflict of interest with all of the businesses that the trump organization has overseas with foreign business leaders, with foreign companies i wish you were this compassion et about the clinton foundation. i didn t interrupt you, ben, don t interrupt me. with foreign ventures and foreign businesses and who knows what kinds of dealings they have and what kind of debt has as