Sharpie Ink News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Sharpie ink. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Sharpie Ink Today - Breaking & Trending Today
the mar-a-lago affidavit by noon eastern today. that document could tell us why investigators believe there was probable cause that crimes had been committed in connection with the classified material being kept at trump s home. that document could also be heavily redacted. we will have to wait and see and we are standing by for that. yet even a redacted version could offer new revelations about the investigation and unprecedented search of the former president s home. let s get straight to cnn s jessica schneider she s live in washington standing by with us. jessica, what are you learning about what we may see any moment now? well, the big question here, kate, is how much of this document will the public actually see. you know, this is a document the prosecutors have previously talked about in court as being very lengthy, as talking about the sources and methods of this criminal investigation, ongoing criminal investigation, i might add, as well as discussing the d ....
Through. all right. in the meantime joining me is cnn counterterrorism analyst, phil mudd, a former fbi senior intelligence adviser and a defense attorney and former federal prosecutor. cnn national security analyst sean turner standing by as well. let me start with you, jessica went over it, but let s start with the basics as we re waiting for this to come through. why did the justice department really push for redactions and why did the judge decide they need redactions? talk to me more about that. sure. well, as we ve heard it s very rare to have an affidavit be released at this early stage of an investigation, there s no case yet at this point, so they would be very concerned about revealing the strategy of the case and of course also revealing sensitive information, witnesses, timelines, et cetera. that s why they were pushing for the redactions. now, my initial reaction to this, kate, was that after you got through redacting it would just look like a solid black box of sharpi ....
i think there are two things that it means. first of all, it means doj did not give them just a bunch of sharpie black ink but i think the judge and i think this is generally true with these kinds of cases the judge is not really in a position to be second-guessing the national security implications or even the case strategy implications. the judge is going to be fairly deferential to what doj has decided to strike out. i mean, the judge has no business saying, well, i don t think this is really that sensitive for national security, doesn t have the background for that. i think doj did make a good faith effort obviously, the judge wasn t irritated by it and i think the judge was prepared, as he had said before, he was concerned maybe the redactions would end up meaning that there was nothing of value nor the public, but i think we can read into this that doj made a good faith effort, did narrowly t tailor it in the court s words and there s probably a little ....