Commissioner hillis is about absent continuance cases on south van ness as long as 26 street a question for a conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance until august 11th not august 4th printed in the agenda items 2 ab Record Numbers 2013 at the proposed for continuance until october 2016 i have speaker cards. Open up for Public Comment for Public Comment on the items proposed for continuance calling names . We support of continuance of divisadero did care so thank you for doing that we think that we want to make sure that the highest affordability requirement is placed upon this project i believe the ordinance you passed a couple weeks ago is making its way throats board of supervisors hopefully that is approved and we get the full affordability requirements for this aspect thank you. My name is donna thomas the owner of grove street the property immediately behind divisardero street probably the most greatly impacted by the buildings and have the most adverse effects b
Divisardero street probably the most greatly impacted by the buildings and have the most adverse effects by the buildings im on vacation in october so when will i get to speak it you decided to extend this. Right now proposed for october 20th. Yeah, im begun all of objectivity. We ask you speak in continuance for the project and not on the project itself lets get you in touch with the contractor. Is he here can i found out that. Hes read behind you there. What other time besides october. Okay. How do he speak if hes not willing to extend it. Im speaking in opposition of things on october 20th because it is the person who owns the property that is most effected by this project i feel i need to speak about the project there are certain portions major impact on the building and tenants and im not going to be here in october what do i do. Thank you. We understand the situation and thank you. Did he go now. Sit down well get through. Is there any additional Public Comment on the items propo
Important when do you start and stop projects and is were going to have, you know, youre on hold because we dont want to artifical stop projects to bounce up against the cap did we do it this i dont know when they stopped allowing projects to come forward the review period was in february and march of 1k3wr6789 i cant remember how quickly theyve stopped it but quickly i understand what youre saying and one of the points ive made in the presentation we could have two or three projects that eat two or three million square feet and thats why the sized e size of the pipeline and the size of the projects in the pipeline we want to get anti in front of that maybe the commission will decide whatever policy they adapt will be in the future but take huge amounts of the cap we need to plan. Sure theyre the most likely not to happen in the economy changes theyre the ones that will fall off the list first. You know, how many of the projects in 2015 are over one million that is next year. Several o
1k3wr6789 i cant remember how quickly theyve stopped it but quickly i understand what youre saying and one of the points ive made in the presentation we could have two or three projects that eat two or three million square feet and thats why the sized e size of the pipeline and the size of the projects in the pipeline we want to get anti in front of that maybe the commission will decide whatever policy they adapt will be in the future but take huge amounts of the cap we need to plan. Sure theyre the most likely not to happen in the economy changes theyre the ones that will fall off the list first. You know, how many of the projects in 2015 are over one million that is next year. Several of next year. Where are they. You mean if you look at the list you have first street and 51th street over one million and 5 m over a million and have transbay block 5, seven hundred thousand square feet those 3 are 3 million square feet that could potentially came forward as early as next year not guara
The policy in 2009 the Planning Commission said the projects were staying active and moving towards construction well not actively revoke them but projects that are lacking we should look at those weve over the years brought several cases to you for revocation because in 2009 the commission requested a information on certain projects to insure theres not a lot of outstanding caps. So the big item is the sales force site that could add a lot to the allocation have we asked them theres talk about adding to the warriors and the sales force controlled was allocated so youll not have to reallocate those. So its not clear at this point how much space the warriors radio going to build but probably less than what was less than allocated that could give you more Square Footage. Right a couple of hundred square feet down the road. And then because it seems like like were not ready to halt the projects and get into a contest we dont know where the economy may go we may be stepping into that if th