The latest news and information from around the world with host Ana Cabrera. Theft and crash is it also reveals an enormous security issue. Were lucky that only that man at the controls was involved. Imagine if this commercial plane had been full of passengers. Juliette kayyem. And scott miller a commercial pilot for 30 years. If this Ground Worker is able to grab a plane and take off how far is a stretch is it for someone with more sinister intentions to do the same thing. There is always going to be a risk in aviation and particularly from what would be known as an insider threat, someone who has gone through security, that the company at least has sort of confidence in. By the time a Passenger Airline is being filled with people it already has a cockpit staff. It already has the Security Apparatus surrounding it. In some ways he took advantage of the vulnerabilities because the plane was in fact empty. Scott, what crossed your mind
when you heard about what happened. At first i thou
could have occurred, yet it did. i think the key to preventing this in the future is a little more rigorous screening of the employees, perhaps both before hire and during their employment as well. unfortunately, when you have threats from the inside, exceedingly difficult to detect, as proven by the german tragedy last year. that s something that has to be looked at. you get to the point where security gets in the way of doing the job. and we can t allow that to happen. there is limited time for the aircraft to be service the on the ground. we need to make sure that stays as efficient as possible as well. we know the seatac airport is the ninth busiest in the country. if it happens there it makes me wonder if smaller airports are at greater risk? and how often are airplanes of any size stole sfwloon i would say the risk isn t really correlated to the aircraft or
and special prosecutor is the only way to have an independent impartial objective prosecutor to holed people accountable. have you heard any evidence of what the trump white house was doing in the 18 ao days after being informed. it s pretty damning to have the the to have sally yates go to the white house and say look your national security adviser is the subject of potential blackmail and yet michael flynn is allowed to sit in on meetings even a phone call with vladimir put sfwloon allowed to sit in on meetings, allowed to lie to the vice president, to be in national security briefings where he is party to very important classified information. at the same time vulnerable to blackmail. is there any evidence what the white house did in the 18 days whether they were investigating this. that will be the next step in the investigation to determine what they did during the 18 days because sally yates was fired several days after she warned the white house counsel about it. and o